COMPARE · Reviewed July 9, 2026
CPK vs SBS
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CPK scored 65.6, SBS scored 63.9 — CPK leads.
Compare another set
CPK
Chesapeake Utilities Corporation
65.6
$127.91 · $3.1B
Score gap
1.7
CPK leads
SBS
Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP
63.9
$5.84 · $20.5B
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
CPK
stronger →← stronger
SBS
50
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
54
90
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
90
63
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
74
SBS is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CPK
SBS
-$210mF
FCF
-$1.8bF
+18.1%B+
Rev
+41.3%A
1.01A-
D/E
1.18B+
3.1xC+
P/S
2.6xB
2.27C
PEG
0.47A
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Model signals
CPK
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
SBS
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
- Diluting shareholders
- Short track record
- Foreign reporter (BRL)
The companies
CPKChesapeake Utilities Corporation
Why now
Utilities - Regulated Gas · market cap $3.1b. 9% off the 52-week high of $140.59. Revenue growing +18%, comfortably above the S&P median. 5 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $146.80 (implying +15% upside).
Moat
Net margin 15% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent.
Risk
Free cash flow is negative (-$210m) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk. Reserve-replacement treadmill — every barrel or ounce extracted has to be replaced through exploration or acquisition; underspending on replacement reserves shows up in production declines 2-3 years out.
SBSCompanhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP
Why now
Utilities - Regulated Water · market cap $20.5b. 18% off the 52-week high of $7.16. Revenue growing +41% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.47 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 5 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $6.84 (implying +17% upside).
Moat
Net margin 27% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 26% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Free cash flow is negative (-$1.8b) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.