COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
CIG vs CPK
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CIG scored 83.0, CPK scored 55.9 — CIG leads.
Compare another set
CIG
Comp En De Mn Cemig
83
$1.92
Score gap
27.1
CIG leads
CPK
Chesapeake Utilities Corporation
55.9
$134.13 · $3.2B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- Fastest growthCPK+14.6%
- Strongest balance sheetCIG0.78
- Highest qualityCPK50 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CIG
CPK
$354mC
FCF
-$194mF
+8.1%B
Rev
+14.6%B+
0.78A
D/E
1.01A-
6.2xA
P/E
—
0.33A
PEG
2.48C
—
P/S
3.3xC+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Model signals
CIG
No notable signals flagged.
CPK
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
The companies
CIGComp En De Mn Cemig
Why now
Utilities - Regulated Electric · market cap n/a. Down 30% from 52-week high of $2.76 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.33 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 3 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $2.14 (implying +11% upside).
Moat
Net margin 18% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 26% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Down 30% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Dividend payout 80% of earnings on a 9.2% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut.
CPKChesapeake Utilities Corporation
Why now
Utilities - Regulated Gas · market cap $3.2b. 5% off the 52-week high of $140.83. Revenue growing +15%, comfortably above the S&P median. 5 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $146.90 (implying +10% upside).
Moat
Net margin 15% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent.
Risk
Free cash flow is negative (-$194m) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk. Reserve-replacement treadmill — every barrel or ounce extracted has to be replaced through exploration or acquisition; underspending on replacement reserves shows up in production declines 2-3 years out.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.