COMPARE · Data as of August 12, 2026
CPA vs FDXF
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CPA scored 65.6, FDXF scored 33.7 — CPA leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. FDXF's fundamentals are as of May 2026, but CPA's are as of December 2025 — a 5-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
CPA
Copa Holdings, S.A.
65.6
$135.86 · $5.5B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
31.9
CPA leads
FDXF
FedEx Freight Holding Company, Inc.
33.7
$141.24 · $21.1B
fundamentals as of
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
CPA
stronger →← stronger
FDXF
78
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
34
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
37
73
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
30
CPA is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CPA
FDXF
$335mC
FCF
-$212mF
+5.0%C+
Rev
-1.1%D+
0.89C+
D/E
—
8.8xA
P/E
—
0.94B+
PEG
—
—
P/S
2.4xB
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
CPA
FDXF
13% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
—
~6%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
—
-1%
1-yr DCF upside
—
+15%
5-yr DCF upside
—
+42%
10-yr DCF upside
—
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
CPA
Why this score
- Durable high returns
- Cyclical growth
FDXF
Why this score
- Short track record
The companies
CPACopa Holdings, S.A.
Why now
Airlines · market cap $5.5b. 15% off the 52-week high of $160.47. PEG 0.94 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 15 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $179.07 (implying +32% upside).
Moat
Net margin 19% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 24% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
FDXFFedEx Freight Holding Company, Inc.
Why now
Integrated Freight & Logistics · market cap $21.1b. Down 29% from 52-week high of $200.00 — deep drawdown territory. 12 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $169.42 (implying +20% upside).
Moat
Higher-variance name — the moat signals on the quantitative card are modest, so the durability case rests on execution (turning current growth into durable earnings power) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than an entrenched competitive position.
Risk
Free cash flow is negative (-$212m) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk. Trailing P/E 32x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates. ROE -132% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where CPA and FDXF diverge
On the headline score the gap is 31.9 points in favour of CPA. The widest single difference is Quality, where CPA leads by 43.5 points.
- QualityCPA 77.6 · FDXF 34.1CPA +43.5
- ValueCPA 72.7 · FDXF 30.5CPA +42.2
- GrowthCPA 50.0 · FDXF 37.0CPA +13.0
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.