COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
COST vs PSMT
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. COST scored 39.9, PSMT scored 48.8 — PSMT leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. PSMT's fundamentals are as of May 2026, but COST's are as of August 2025 — a 9-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
39.9
$947.74 · $420.3B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
8.9
PSMT leads
PSMT
PriceSmart, Inc.
48.8
$172.87 · $5.3B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestPSMT33.2x
- Fastest growthPSMT+10.2%
- Strongest balance sheetPSMT0.24
- Highest qualityCOST76 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
COST
stronger →← stronger
PSMT
76
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
63
72
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
81
12
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
23
PSMT is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
COST
PSMT
$7.8bB+
FCF
$74mC-
+8.2%B
Rev
+10.2%B
0.60B+
D/E
0.24A-
47.6xD
P/E
33.2xC
4.64D
PEG
1.83C+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
COST
PSMT
177% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
211% above
~33%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~39%/yr
-67%
1-yr DCF upside
-73%
-64%
5-yr DCF upside
-68%
-59%
10-yr DCF upside
-59%
These two disagree on this pair: the Value pillar ranks cheapness against sector peers, while price-vs-fair-value is an absolute read. A name can be the better value in its sector and still the dearer one on cash flows.
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
COST
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
PSMT
No notable signals flagged.
The companies
COSTCostco Wholesale Corporation
Why now
Discount Stores · market cap $420.3b. 14% off the 52-week high of $1096.50. 35 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $1,077 (implying +14% upside).
Moat
ROE 24% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 97% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined. $420.3b market cap places it among the largest companies in the sector — distribution, R&D, and customer-acquisition costs amortize across a base peers can't replicate.
Risk
Trailing P/E 48x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates. Net margin 2.9% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
PSMTPriceSmart, Inc.
Why now
Discount Stores · market cap $5.3b. 13% off the 52-week high of $199.84. Revenue growing +10%, comfortably above the S&P median. 3 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $153.33 (implying -11% upside).
Moat
ROE 12% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Trailing P/E 33x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates. Net margin 2.8% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where COST and PSMT diverge
On the headline score the gap is 8.9 points in favor of PSMT. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- QualityCOST 75.7 · PSMT 63.2COST +12.5
- ValueCOST 11.6 · PSMT 22.6PSMT +11.0
- GrowthCOST 72.5 · PSMT 81.4PSMT +8.9
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.