COMPARE · Data as of October 13, 2026

COLB vs OZK

Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. COLB scored 74.0, OZK scored 76.0 — OZK leads.
Compare another set
COLB
Columbia Banking System, Inc.
Banks - Regional · Financial strength
72.8Fin
$28.23 · $8.0B
fundamentals as of
Strength gap
2.8
OZK leads
OZK
Bank OZK
Banks - Regional · Financial strength
75.6Fin
$45.08 · $4.9B
fundamentals as of
  • CheapestOZK7.4x
  • Fastest growthCOLB+19.3%
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD72.8/ 100 · FIN STRENGTHPEER MEDIANFINANCIAL72.8
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD75.6/ 100 · FIN STRENGTHPEER MEDIANFINANCIAL75.6
cheap & fastrevenue growth →← cheaper (lower multiple)-6%29%2.4x16xCOLBOZK

Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.

RevCOLB+19.3%OZK+4.2%
P/ECOLB11.1xOZK7.4x
ROECOLB11.0%OZK11.3%
P/BCOLB1.07OZK0.83
YieldCOLB5.2%OZK4.4%
COLB
OZK
+19.3%B+
Rev
+4.2%C+
11.1xB+
P/E
7.4xA
11.0%B
ROE
11.3%B
1.07A-
P/B
0.83A-
5.2%A-
Yield
4.4%B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
COLBColumbia Banking System, Inc.
Banks - Regional · $28.23 · beta 0.69
Why now
Banks - Regional · market cap $8.0b. 16% off the 52-week high of $33.68. Revenue growing +19%, comfortably above the S&P median. 14 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $33.43 (implying +18% upside).
Moat
Net margin 28% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 11% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. Financial moat — scale of deposit base / underwriting franchise plus regulatory capital advantages. The largest players compound book value through cycles that erase smaller competitors.
Risk
Balance-sheet financial — book value, net interest margin, and credit loss provisions are the lever points; a rates regime change or a deterioration in the loan book moves the stock more than EPS does.
OZKBank OZK
Banks - Regional · $45.08 · beta 0.91
Why now
Banks - Regional · market cap $4.9b. 16% off the 52-week high of $53.39. 9 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $53.78 (implying +19% upside).
Moat
Net margin 45% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 11% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. Financial moat — scale of deposit base / underwriting franchise plus regulatory capital advantages. The largest players compound book value through cycles that erase smaller competitors.
Risk
Balance-sheet financial — book value, net interest margin, and credit loss provisions are the lever points; a rates regime change or a deterioration in the loan book moves the stock more than EPS does.
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.

Common questions

Is OZK or COLB the better stock?

OZK scores higher: OZK 76.0, COLB 74.0 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.

How are OZK and COLB scored?

Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.

How current is this comparison?

The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.