COMPARE · Data as of August 24, 2026
COCO vs TSN
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. COCO scored 66.4, TSN scored 45.3 — COCO leads.
Compare another set
COCO
The Vita Coco Company, Inc.
66.4
$63.36 · $3.7B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
21.1
COCO leads
TSN
Tyson Foods, Inc.
45.3
$57.87 · $20.4B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestCOCO35.0x
- Fastest growthCOCO+26.1%
- Strongest balance sheetCOCO0.04
- Highest qualityCOCO85 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueTSN-5%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
COCO
stronger →← stronger
TSN
85
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
49
93
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
38
37
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
50
COCO is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
COCO
TSN
$124mC
FCF
$1.2bC+
+26.1%A-
Rev
+2.9%C
0.04A
D/E
0.44B+
35.0xC
P/E
36.2xC
2.29C
PEG
1.04B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
COCO
TSN
25% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
5% below
~15%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~7%/yr
-32%
1-yr DCF upside
-8%
-20%
5-yr DCF upside
+5%
+1%
10-yr DCF upside
+27%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
COCO
Why this score
- Durable high returns
TSN
No notable signals flagged.
The companies
COCOThe Vita Coco Company, Inc.
Why now
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic · market cap $3.7b. Down 26% from 52-week high of $85.83 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +26% — in hypergrowth territory. 9 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $83.89 (implying +32% upside).
Moat
Net margin 16% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 27% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 114% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trailing P/E 35x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
TSNTyson Foods, Inc.
Why now
Farm Products · market cap $20.4b. 17% off the 52-week high of $69.48. 12 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $68.75 (implying +19% upside).
Moat
Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
Trailing P/E 36x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates. Net margin 1.0% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first. ROE 3% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where COCO and TSN diverge
On the headline score the gap is 21.1 points in favor of COCO. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- GrowthCOCO 93.0 · TSN 38.0COCO +55.0
- QualityCOCO 84.7 · TSN 49.3COCO +35.4
- ValueCOCO 37.2 · TSN 49.5TSN +12.3
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.