COMPARE · Reviewed July 29, 2026
CNX vs RRC
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CNX scored 72.0, RRC scored 63.3 — CNX leads.
Compare another set
CNX
CNX Resources Corp
72
$34.49 · $5.0B
Score gap
8.7
CNX leads
RRC
Range Resources Corporation
63.3
$39.42 · $9.2B
fundamentals as of
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
CNX
stronger →← stronger
RRC
88
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
90
90
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
81
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
57
CNX is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CNX
RRC
$557mC+
FCF
$1.4bC+
+45.2%A
Rev
+17.3%B+
0.56B+
D/E
0.22A-
4.2xA
P/E
10.9xA-
0.09A
PEG
1.37B
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
CNX
RRC
73% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
47% below
~-16%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-15%/yr
+185%
1-yr DCF upside
+104%
+277%
5-yr DCF upside
+88%
+479%
10-yr DCF upside
+68%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
CNX
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Short track record
RRC
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
- Cyclical growth
- Short track record
The companies
CNXCNX Resources Corp
Why now
Energy · market cap $5.0b. Down 21% from 52-week high of $43.62 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +45% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.09 — paying under fair value for the growth rate.
Moat
Net margin 55% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 27% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Reserve-replacement treadmill — every barrel or ounce extracted has to be replaced through exploration or acquisition; underspending on replacement reserves shows up in production declines 2-3 years out.
RRCRange Resources Corporation
Why now
Oil & Gas E&P · market cap $9.2b. 18% off the 52-week high of $48.31. Revenue growing +17%, comfortably above the S&P median. 22 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $45.36 (implying +15% upside).
Moat
Net margin 26% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 18% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 158% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Hedge-book exposure — many commodity producers hedge forward production; if the hedge book is concentrated at prices well below spot, the upside the market expects is already locked away.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.