COMPARE · Reviewed July 29, 2026
CNX vs GPOR
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CNX scored 72.0, GPOR scored 67.5 — CNX leads.
Compare another set
CNX
CNX Resources Corp
72
$34.49 · $5.0B
Score gap
4.5
CNX leads
GPOR
Gulfport Energy Corporation
67.5
$155.93 · $2.8B
fundamentals as of
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
CNX
stronger →← stronger
GPOR
88
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
79
90
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
81
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
78
CNX is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CNX
GPOR
$557mC+
FCF
$362mC
+45.2%A
Rev
+90.7%A
0.56B+
D/E
0.46B+
4.2xA
P/E
5.1xA
0.09A
PEG
0.12A
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
CNX
GPOR
73% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
63% below
~-16%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-12%/yr
+185%
1-yr DCF upside
+121%
+277%
5-yr DCF upside
+173%
+479%
10-yr DCF upside
+271%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
CNX
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Short track record
GPOR
Why this score
- Cyclical growth
The companies
CNXCNX Resources Corp
Why now
Energy · market cap $5.0b. Down 21% from 52-week high of $43.62 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +45% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.09 — paying under fair value for the growth rate.
Moat
Net margin 55% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 27% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Reserve-replacement treadmill — every barrel or ounce extracted has to be replaced through exploration or acquisition; underspending on replacement reserves shows up in production declines 2-3 years out.
GPORGulfport Energy Corporation
Why now
Oil & Gas E&P · market cap $2.8b. Down 31% from 52-week high of $225.78 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +91% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.12 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 12 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $231.08 (implying +48% upside).
Moat
Net margin 36% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 33% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Down 31% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Jurisdictional + permitting risk — mining and extraction operations concentrate exposure to political stability, royalty regimes, and environmental review timelines that can stall production for years.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.