COMPARE · Data as of August 24, 2026
CNR vs DNN
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CNR scored 46.9, DNN scored 15.7 — CNR leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. CNR's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but DNN's are as of December 2025 — a 6-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
CNR
Core Natural Resources, Inc.
46.9
$96.21 · $4.8B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
31.2
CNR leads
DNN
Denison Mines Corp.
15.7
$3.54 · $3.2B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- Fastest growthCNR+31.5%
- Strongest balance sheetCNR0.12
- Highest qualityCNR48 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueCNR-22%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
CNR
stronger →← stronger
DNN
48
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
18
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
43
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
3
CNR is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CNR
DNN
$260mC
FCF
-$105mF
+31.5%A
Rev
+22.2%A-
0.12A
D/E
2.38D
48.3xC
P/E
—
0.73A-
PEG
106.92D
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
CNR
DNN
22% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
—
~8%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
—
-3%
1-yr DCF upside
—
+28%
5-yr DCF upside
—
+91%
10-yr DCF upside
—
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
CNR
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Cut its dividend
- Cyclical growth
DNN
Why this score
- Cyclical growth
- Foreign reporter (CAD)
The companies
CNRCore Natural Resources, Inc.
Why now
Thermal Coal · market cap $4.8b. 16% off the 52-week high of $114.80. Revenue growing +32% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.73 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 4 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $107.00 (implying +11% upside).
Moat
Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
Trailing P/E 48x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates. Net margin 2.3% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first. ROE 3% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
DNNDenison Mines Corp.
Why now
Uranium · market cap $3.2b. Down 20% from 52-week high of $4.43 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +22%, comfortably above the S&P median.
Moat
Higher-variance name — the moat signals on the quantitative card are modest, so the durability case rests on execution (turning current growth into durable earnings power) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than an entrenched competitive position.
Risk
D/E 2.38 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Free cash flow is negative (-$105m) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk. Beta 1.60 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where CNR and DNN diverge
On the headline score the gap is 31.2 points in favor of CNR. The widest single difference is Value, where CNR leads by 40.6 points.
- ValueCNR 43.2 · DNN 2.6CNR +40.6
- QualityCNR 47.8 · DNN 18.0CNR +29.8
- GrowthCNR 50.0 · DNN 50.0level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.