Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CLX scored 53.9, KVUE scored 48.4 — CLX leads.
Compare another set
CLX
The Clorox Company
Household & Personal Products · Quality-Growth
53.9
$83.80 · $10.1B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
5.5
CLX leads
KVUE
Kenvue Inc.
Household & Personal Products · Quality-Growth
48.4
$17.70 · $34.0B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
CheapestCLX17.4x
Fastest growthKVUE+1.8%
Highest qualityCLX79 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
CLX
stronger →← stronger
KVUE
79
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
70
31
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
38
64
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
42
CLX is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CLX
KVUE
$405mC
FCF
$1.9bC+
-5.4%D
Rev
+1.8%C
—
D/E
0.82B
17.4xB
P/E
20.6xB
1.04B+
PEG
1.41B
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
CLX
KVUE
19% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
25% above
~6%/yr
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
~8%/yr
-13%
1-yr DCF upside
-18%
-16%
5-yr DCF upside
-20%
-21%
10-yr DCF upside
-23%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
The companies
CLXThe Clorox Company
Household & Personal Products · $83.80 · beta 0.57
Why now
Household & Personal Products · market cap $10.1b. Down 35% from 52-week high of $128.90 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue -5% — in contraction; any catalyst that reverses this triggers re-rating. 17 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $99.59 (implying +19% upside).
Moat
Moat signals from the quantitative card are modest — profitability and capital efficiency are middle-of-pack. The thesis here depends on softer factors (switching costs, brand, distribution, regulatory protection) not captured by the quality-growth screen.
Risk
Revenue contracting -5% — the operational turn is not yet visible in the top line. Down 35% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Dividend payout 103% of earnings on a 6.0% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut.
KVUEKenvue Inc.
Household & Personal Products · $17.70 · beta 0.45
Why now
Household & Personal Products · market cap $34.0b. 12% off the 52-week high of $20.13. 12 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $19.50 (implying +10% upside).
Moat
ROE 16% is above 15% — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 115% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash.
Risk
Dividend payout 97% of earnings on a 4.7% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
KVUE leads CLX by 1 point (59.8 to 58.8), its sharpest advantage coming in Rev (grade C). A contrarian could still prefer CLX for its stronger P/E (grade B+).
Our AI analyst is busy right now, so this verdict is drawn directly from the pillars, grades and DCF above.
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where CLX and KVUE diverge
On the headline score the gap is 5.5 points in favor of CLX. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
ValueCLX 63.5 · KVUE 42.4CLX +21.1
QualityCLX 79.4 · KVUE 70.2CLX +9.2
GrowthCLX 31.1 · KVUE 38.2KVUE +7.1
Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.
Common questions
Is CLX or KVUE the better stock?
CLX scores higher: CLX 53.9, KVUE 48.4 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
Where do CLX and KVUE differ most?
The widest gap is value, where CLX leads by 21 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. Neither name sweeps: they trade the lead across the three pillars, so the comparison is a trade-off rather than one being better on every measure.
How are CLX and KVUE scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.