COMPARE · Data as of August 13, 2026
CLS vs VICR
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CLS scored 67.1, VICR scored 65.3 — CLS leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. CLS's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but VICR's are as of March 2026 — a 3-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
CLS
Celestica Inc.
67.1
$347.63 · $43.8B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
1.8
CLS leads
VICR
Vicor Corporation
65.3
$226.64 · $10.4B
fundamentals as of
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
CLS
stronger →← stronger
VICR
74
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
69
95
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
91
43
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
44
CLS is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CLS
VICR
$519mC+
FCF
$87mC-
+47.3%A
Rev
+96.1%A
0.40B
D/E
0.01A
37.2xB
P/E
72.6xC
1.00B+
PEG
1.23B
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
CLS
VICR
411% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
789% above
>60%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
>60%/yr
-85%
1-yr DCF upside
-91%
-80%
5-yr DCF upside
-89%
-72%
10-yr DCF upside
-84%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
CLS
Why this score
- Durable high returns
VICR
No notable signals flagged.
The companies
CLSCelestica Inc.
Why now
Electronic Components · market cap $43.8b. Down 27% from 52-week high of $474.03 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +47% — in hypergrowth territory. 17 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $473.24 (implying +36% upside).
Moat
ROE 45% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Beta 1.52 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. Trailing P/E 37x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
VICRVicor Corporation
Why now
Electronic Components · market cap $10.4b. Down 41% from 52-week high of $382.65 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +96% — in hypergrowth territory. 4 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $386.25 (implying +70% upside).
Moat
Net margin 19% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 18% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately.
Risk
Trailing P/E 72.6x prices in sustained high growth — any quarter that disappoints triggers sharp re-rating. Down 41% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Beta 2.38 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where CLS and VICR diverge
On the headline score the gap is 1.8 points in favour of CLS. The widest single difference is Quality, where CLS leads by 5.4 points.
- QualityCLS 74.0 · VICR 68.6CLS +5.4
- GrowthCLS 94.8 · VICR 91.1CLS +3.7
- ValueCLS 43.0 · VICR 44.5level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.