COMPARE · Reviewed August 3, 2026
CLH vs VLTO
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CLH scored 61.5, VLTO scored 68.1 — VLTO leads.
Compare another set
CLH
Clean Harbors, Inc.
61.5
$311.56 · $16.4B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
6.6
VLTO leads
VLTO
Veralto Corporation
68.1
$96.11 · $23.4B
fundamentals as of
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
CLH
stronger →← stronger
VLTO
61
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
82
65
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
67
58
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
58
VLTO is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CLH
VLTO
$467mC
FCF
$1.0bC+
+1.9%C
Rev
+5.9%C+
1.11C+
D/E
1.16C+
37.8xC+
P/E
24.2xB+
0.27A
PEG
2.43C
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
CLH
VLTO
119% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
9% above
~22%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~8%/yr
-54%
1-yr DCF upside
-14%
-54%
5-yr DCF upside
-8%
-56%
10-yr DCF upside
+2%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
CLH
No notable signals flagged.
VLTO
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
- Short track record
The companies
CLHClean Harbors, Inc.
Why now
Waste Management · market cap $16.4b. 7% off the 52-week high of $335.94. PEG 0.27 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 15 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $358.93 (implying +15% upside).
Moat
ROE 14% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 118% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trailing P/E 38x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
VLTOVeralto Corporation
Why now
Pollution & Treatment Controls · market cap $23.4b. 13% off the 52-week high of $110.11. 17 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $112.76 (implying +17% upside).
Moat
Net margin 17% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 32% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 108% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.