COMPARE · Reviewed August 3, 2026
CLH vs RSG
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CLH scored 61.5, RSG scored 51.2 — CLH leads.
Compare another set
CLH
Clean Harbors, Inc.
61.5
$311.56 · $16.4B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
10.3
CLH leads
RSG
Republic Services, Inc.
51.2
$208.53 · $64.5B
fundamentals as of
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
CLH
stronger →← stronger
RSG
61
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
69
65
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
65
58
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
30
CLH and RSG split the three pillars evenly.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CLH
RSG
$467mC
FCF
$2.6bB
+1.9%C
Rev
+3.2%C+
1.11C+
D/E
1.18C+
37.8xC+
P/E
29.9xB
0.27A
PEG
3.03D
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
CLH
RSG
119% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
42% above
~22%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~16%/yr
-54%
1-yr DCF upside
-36%
-54%
5-yr DCF upside
-30%
-56%
10-yr DCF upside
-19%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
CLH
No notable signals flagged.
RSG
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
The companies
CLHClean Harbors, Inc.
Why now
Waste Management · market cap $16.4b. 7% off the 52-week high of $335.94. PEG 0.27 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 15 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $358.93 (implying +15% upside).
Moat
ROE 14% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 118% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trailing P/E 38x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
RSGRepublic Services, Inc.
Why now
Waste Management · market cap $64.5b. 13% off the 52-week high of $238.62. 24 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $245.38 (implying +18% upside).
Moat
Net margin 13% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 18% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 120% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.