COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
CIG vs TLN
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CIG scored 83.0, TLN scored 54.4 — CIG leads.
Compare another set
CIG
Comp En De Mn Cemig
83
$1.92
Score gap
28.6
CIG leads
TLN
Talen Energy Corporation
54.4
$314.46 · $15.1B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- Fastest growthTLN+108.9%
- Strongest balance sheetCIG0.78
- Highest qualityTLN27 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CIG
TLN
$354mC
FCF
$568mC+
+8.1%B
Rev
+108.9%A
0.78A
D/E
5.84D
6.2xA
P/E
—
0.33A
PEG
—
—
P/S
3.8xC
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
CIG
TLN
—
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
75% above
—
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~31%/yr
—
1-yr DCF upside
-56%
—
5-yr DCF upside
-43%
—
10-yr DCF upside
-18%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
CIG
No notable signals flagged.
TLN
Why this score
- Diluting shareholders
The companies
CIGComp En De Mn Cemig
Why now
Utilities - Regulated Electric · market cap n/a. Down 30% from 52-week high of $2.76 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.33 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 3 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $2.14 (implying +11% upside).
Moat
Net margin 18% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 26% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Down 30% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Dividend payout 80% of earnings on a 9.2% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut.
TLNTalen Energy Corporation
Why now
Utilities - Independent Power Producers · market cap $15.1b. Down 30% from 52-week high of $451.28 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +109% — in hypergrowth territory. 16 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $465.50 (implying +48% upside).
Moat
Turnaround / out-of-favor name — GAAP-unprofitable for now, so the durability case is forward-looking: it rests on a recovery (margin normalization, a cyclical upturn or restructuring) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than on current reported results.
Risk
D/E 5.84 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Currently unprofitable (margin -5.6%) — path to GAAP profitability is the core thesis risk. Down 30% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.