COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
CIG vs NI
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CIG scored 83.0, NI scored 55.7 — CIG leads.
Compare another set
CIG
Comp En De Mn Cemig
83
$1.92
Score gap
27.3
CIG leads
NI
NiSource Inc.
55.7
$40.62 · $19.5B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- Fastest growthNI+17.0%
- Strongest balance sheetCIG0.78
- Highest qualityNI52 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CIG
NI
$354mC
FCF
-$1.1bF
+8.1%B
Rev
+17.0%B+
0.78A
D/E
1.47B
6.2xA
P/E
—
0.33A
PEG
2.37C
—
P/S
1.7xA-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Model signals
CIG
No notable signals flagged.
NI
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
The companies
CIGComp En De Mn Cemig
Why now
Utilities - Regulated Electric · market cap n/a. Down 30% from 52-week high of $2.76 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.33 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 3 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $2.14 (implying +11% upside).
Moat
Net margin 18% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 26% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Down 30% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Dividend payout 80% of earnings on a 9.2% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut.
NINiSource Inc.
Why now
Utilities - Regulated Gas · market cap $19.5b. 17% off the 52-week high of $49.21. Revenue growing +17%, comfortably above the S&P median. 14 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $50.07 (implying +23% upside).
Moat
Higher-variance name — the moat signals on the quantitative card are modest, so the durability case rests on execution (turning current growth into durable earnings power) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than an entrenched competitive position.
Risk
Free cash flow is negative (-$1.1b) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk. Production-cost sensitivity — top-quartile cost producers generate cash through the cycle while marginal producers burn it; watch the cost-per-unit trend, not just headline revenue.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.