COMPARE · Data as of August 24, 2026
CIG vs FRVO
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CIG scored 82.0, FRVO scored 35.3 — CIG leads.
Compare another set
CIG
Comp En De Mn Cemig
82
$1.95
Score gap
46.7
CIG leads
FRVO
Fervo Energy Company
35.3
$15.47 · $4.6B
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- Fastest growthCIG+8.1%
- Strongest balance sheetFRVO0.11
- Highest qualityFRVO74 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CIG
FRVO
$354mC
FCF
—
+8.1%B
Rev
-30.7%F
0.78A-
D/E
0.11A
6.3xA
P/E
—
0.33A
PEG
—
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Model signals
CIG
No notable signals flagged.
FRVO
Why this score
- Short track record
The companies
CIGComp En De Mn Cemig
Why now
Utilities - Regulated Electric · market cap n/a. Down 29% from 52-week high of $2.76 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.33 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 3 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $2.14 (implying +10% upside).
Moat
Net margin 18% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 26% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Dividend payout 80% of earnings on a 9.2% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut.
FRVOFervo Energy Company
Why now
Utilities - Renewable · market cap $4.6b. Down 64% from 52-week high of $42.65 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue -31% — in contraction; any catalyst that reverses this triggers re-rating. 11 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $42.82 (implying +177% upside).
Moat
Higher-variance name — the moat signals on the quantitative card are modest, so the durability case rests on execution (turning current growth into durable earnings power) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than an entrenched competitive position.
Risk
Revenue contracting -31% — the operational turn is not yet visible in the top line. Down 64% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
CIG leads FRVO by 26.2 points (61.5 to 35.3), its sharpest advantage coming in Rev (grade B). A contrarian could still prefer FRVO for its stronger D/E (grade A). Note they play different roles — CIG screens as value, FRVO screens as spec — so the model rewards different traits for each.
Our AI analyst is busy right now, so this verdict is drawn directly from the pillars, grades and DCF above.
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.