COMPARE · Data as of August 14, 2026
CIG vs FE
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CIG scored 44.3, FE scored 62.3 — FE leads.
Compare another set
CIG
Energy of Minas Gerais Co
44.3
$1.93 · $33.6B
Score gap
18.0
FE leads
FE
FirstEnergy Corp.
62.3
$47.41 · $27.4B
fundamentals as of
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
CIG
stronger →← stronger
FE
66
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
55
15
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
82
90
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
54
CIG is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CIG
FE
$195mC
FCF
-$1.7bF
-3.1%D+
Rev
+11.3%B
0.70B
D/E
2.01C
6.9xA
P/E
—
—
PEG
1.67C+
—
P/S
1.8xA-
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
CIG
FE
1245% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
—
>60%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
—
-92%
1-yr DCF upside
—
-93%
5-yr DCF upside
—
-93%
10-yr DCF upside
—
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
CIG
Why this score
- Cut its dividend
- Short track record
FE
Why this score
- Durable high returns
The companies
CIGEnergy of Minas Gerais Co
Why now
Utilities · market cap $33.6b. Down 86% from 52-week high of $13.87 — deep drawdown territory.
Moat
ROE 17% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately.
Risk
Down 86% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Dividend payout 103% of earnings on a 11.8% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut.
FEFirstEnergy Corp.
Why now
Utilities - Regulated Electric · market cap $27.4b. 9% off the 52-week high of $52.34. Revenue growing +11%, comfortably above the S&P median. 13 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $53.08 (implying +12% upside).
Moat
Higher-variance name — the moat signals on the quantitative card are modest, so the durability case rests on execution (turning current growth into durable earnings power) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than an entrenched competitive position.
Risk
D/E 2.01 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Free cash flow is negative (-$1.7b) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
FE leads CIG by 0.6 points (62.3 to 61.7). A contrarian could still prefer CIG, which trades about 5% below our DCF fair value — a margin of safety the score doesn't reward. Note they play different roles — CIG screens as value, FE screens as spec — so the model rewards different traits for each.
Our AI analyst is busy right now, so this verdict is drawn directly from the pillars, grades and DCF above.
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where CIG and FE diverge
On the headline score the gap is 18.0 points in favor of FE. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- GrowthCIG 14.7 · FE 81.6FE +66.9
- ValueCIG 89.6 · FE 53.6CIG +36.0
- QualityCIG 66.1 · FE 55.2CIG +10.9
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.