COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
ALHC vs CI
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. ALHC scored 63.4, CI scored 76.9 — CI leads.
Compare another set
ALHC
Alignment Healthcare, Inc.
63.4
$13.16 · $2.7B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
13.5
CI leads
CI
The Cigna Group
76.9
$277.51 · $73.3B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestCI11.5x
- Fastest growthALHC+46.1%
- Strongest balance sheetCI0.74
- Highest qualityCI60 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueCI-53%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
ALHC
stronger →← stronger
CI
46
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
60
96
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
85
58
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
89
CI is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
ALHC
CI
$178mC
FCF
$9.1bB+
+46.1%A
Rev
+11.3%B
1.25C
D/E
0.74C+
69.3xD
P/E
11.5xA
1.31B
PEG
0.83B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
ALHC
CI
28% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
53% below
~7%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-11%/yr
+5%
1-yr DCF upside
+95%
+38%
5-yr DCF upside
+112%
+105%
10-yr DCF upside
+140%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
ALHC
Why this score
- Diluting shareholders
CI
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
The companies
ALHCAlignment Healthcare, Inc.
Why now
Healthcare Plans · market cap $2.7b. Down 48% from 52-week high of $25.12 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +46% — in hypergrowth territory. 13 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $24.08 (implying +83% upside).
Moat
ROE 20% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
Trailing P/E 69.3x prices in sustained high growth — any quarter that disappoints triggers sharp re-rating. Down 48% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Net margin 0.9% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
CIThe Cigna Group
Why now
Healthcare Plans · market cap $73.3b. 12% off the 52-week high of $315.47. Revenue growing +11%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.83 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 24 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $341.42 (implying +23% upside).
Moat
ROE 17% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 142% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined. $73.3b market cap gives the company enough scale to absorb fixed costs that subscale competitors can't, without yet being so large that growth has to come from acquisition.
Risk
Net margin 2.3% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where ALHC and CI diverge
On the headline score the gap is 13.5 points in favor of CI. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- ValueALHC 57.8 · CI 88.6CI +30.8
- QualityALHC 45.6 · CI 60.1CI +14.5
- GrowthALHC 96.5 · CI 85.2ALHC +11.3
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.