Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CHTR scored 59.5, TU scored 27.2 — CHTR leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. CHTR's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but TU's are as of December 2025 — a 6-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
CHTR
Charter Communications, Inc.
Telecom Services · Quality-Growth
59.5
$103.38 · $13.4B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
32.3
CHTR leads
TU
TELUS Corporation
Telecom Services · Quality-Growth
27.2
$7.72 · $12.2B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
Fastest growthTU+0.6%
Strongest balance sheetTU2.24
Highest qualityCHTR62 / 100
Largest discount to fair valueCHTR-83%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
CHTR
stronger →← stronger
TU
62
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
50
37
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
20
93
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
24
CHTR is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CHTR
TU
$4.4bB
FCF
$1.4bC+
-0.6%D+
Rev
+0.6%C
4.42D
D/E
2.24C
2.9xA
P/E
—
0.62A-
PEG
13.44D
—
P/S
0.9xA-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
CHTR
TU
83% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
49% below
decline
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
~-14%/yr
+507%
1-yr DCF upside
+106%
+473%
5-yr DCF upside
+97%
+427%
10-yr DCF upside
+86%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
CHTR
No notable signals flagged.
TU
Why this score
Diluting shareholders
Cut its dividend
Foreign reporter (CAD)
The companies
CHTRCharter Communications, Inc.
Telecom Services · $103.38 · beta 0.69
Why now
Telecom Services · market cap $13.4b. Down 62% from 52-week high of $268.77 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.62 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 19 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $175.11 (implying +69% upside).
Moat
ROE 27% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
D/E 4.42 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Down 62% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
TUTELUS Corporation
Telecom Services · $7.72 · beta 0.77
Why now
Telecom Services · market cap $12.2b. Down 50% from 52-week high of $15.41 — deep drawdown territory. 3 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $10.33 (implying +34% upside).
Moat
Higher-variance name — the moat signals on the quantitative card are modest, so the durability case rests on execution (turning current growth into durable earnings power) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than an entrenched competitive position.
Risk
D/E 2.24 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Down 50% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Dividend payout 283% of earnings on a 6.6% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where CHTR and TU diverge
On the headline score the gap is 32.3 points in favor of CHTR. The widest single difference is Value, where CHTR leads by 68.6 points.
ValueCHTR 92.7 · TU 24.1CHTR +68.6
GrowthCHTR 36.7 · TU 19.5CHTR +17.2
QualityCHTR 62.0 · TU 49.7CHTR +12.3
Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.
Common questions
Is CHTR or TU the better stock?
CHTR scores higher: CHTR 59.5, TU 27.2 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
Where do CHTR and TU differ most?
The widest gap is value, where CHTR leads by 69 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. CHTR leads all three pillars, so the gap is broad rather than a single-measure difference.
How are CHTR and TU scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.