Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CHTR scored 59.5, GSAT scored 34.4 — CHTR leads.
Compare another set
CHTR
Charter Communications, Inc.
Telecom Services · Quality-Growth
59.5
$103.38 · $13.4B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
25.1
CHTR leads
GSAT
Globalstar, Inc.
Telecom Services · Quality-Growth
34.4
$83.82 · $10.9B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
Fastest growthGSAT+9.0%
Strongest balance sheetGSAT1.43
Highest qualityCHTR62 / 100
Largest discount to fair valueCHTR-83%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
CHTR
stronger →← stronger
GSAT
62
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
39
37
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
67
93
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
16
CHTR is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CHTR
GSAT
$4.4bB
FCF
$527mC+
-0.6%D+
Rev
+9.0%B
4.42D
D/E
1.43C+
2.9xA
P/E
—
0.62A-
PEG
0.50A
—
P/S
38.7xD
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
CHTR
GSAT
83% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
68% above
decline
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
~20%/yr
+507%
1-yr DCF upside
-44%
+473%
5-yr DCF upside
-40%
+427%
10-yr DCF upside
-35%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
The companies
CHTRCharter Communications, Inc.
Telecom Services · $103.38 · beta 0.69
Why now
Telecom Services · market cap $13.4b. Down 62% from 52-week high of $268.77 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.62 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 19 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $175.11 (implying +69% upside).
Moat
ROE 27% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
D/E 4.42 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Down 62% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
GSATGlobalstar, Inc.
Telecom Services · $83.82 · beta 1.45
Why now
Telecom Services · market cap $10.9b. Trading near 52-week high of $84.85 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. PEG 0.50 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 3 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $90.00 (implying +7% upside).
Moat
Turnaround / out-of-favor name — GAAP-unprofitable for now, so the durability case is forward-looking: it rests on a recovery (margin normalization, a cyclical upturn or restructuring) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than on current reported results.
Risk
Currently unprofitable (margin -18.5%) — path to GAAP profitability is the core thesis risk. Trading within 1% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction. Beta 1.45 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where CHTR and GSAT diverge
On the headline score the gap is 25.1 points in favor of CHTR. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
ValueCHTR 92.7 · GSAT 15.6CHTR +77.1
GrowthCHTR 36.7 · GSAT 66.8GSAT +30.1
QualityCHTR 62.0 · GSAT 39.0CHTR +23.0
Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.
Common questions
Is CHTR or GSAT the better stock?
CHTR scores higher: CHTR 59.5, GSAT 34.4 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
Where do CHTR and GSAT differ most?
The widest gap is value, where CHTR leads by 77 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. Neither name sweeps: they trade the lead across the three pillars, so the comparison is a trade-off rather than one being better on every measure.
How are CHTR and GSAT scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.