COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026

CHRD vs XOM

Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CHRD scored 63.0, XOM scored 55.6 — CHRD leads.
Compare another set
CHRD
Chord Energy Corporation
Oil & Gas E&P · Quality-Growth
63
$147.85 · $8.1B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
7.4
CHRD leads
XOM
ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation
Oil & Gas Integrated · Quality-Growth
55.6
$167.72 · $689.7B
fundamentals as of
  • CheapestCHRD10.0x
  • Fastest growthCHRD+19.2%
  • Strongest balance sheetXOM0.16
  • Highest qualityCHRD73 / 100
  • Largest discount to fair valueCHRD-44%
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD63.0/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY72.6GROWTH50.0VALUE68.8
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD55.6/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY71.7GROWTH50.0VALUE48.1
CHRDXOMQuality72.671.7Growth50.050.0Value68.848.1
cheap & fastrevenue growth →← cheaper (lower multiple)-15%29%5.0x27xCHRDXOM

Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.

FCFCHRD$1.2bXOM$30.6b
RevCHRD+19.2%XOM-4.5%
D/ECHRD0.18XOM0.16
P/ECHRD10.0xXOM21.6x
CHRD
stronger →← stronger
XOM
73
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
72
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
69
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
48
CHRD is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
CHRD
XOM
$1.2bC+
FCF
$30.6bA
+19.2%B+
Rev
-4.5%D+
0.18A-
D/E
0.16A
10.0xA-
P/E
21.6xC+
PEG
1.25B
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
CHRD
XOM
44% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
85% above
~-15%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~14%/yr
+99%
1-yr DCF upside
-40%
+79%
5-yr DCF upside
-46%
+55%
10-yr DCF upside
-53%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
CHRD
Why this score
  • Buying back stock
  • Cut its dividend
  • Cyclical growth
XOM
Why this score
  • Revenue shrinking
  • Short track record
CHRDChord Energy Corporation
Oil & Gas E&P · $147.85 · beta 0.38
Why now
Oil & Gas E&P · market cap $8.1b. 3% off the 52-week high of $153.00. Revenue growing +19%, comfortably above the S&P median. 15 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $167.47 (implying +13% upside).
Moat
Net margin 13% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 10% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 140% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Production-cost sensitivity — top-quartile cost producers generate cash through the cycle while marginal producers burn it; watch the cost-per-unit trend, not just headline revenue.
XOMExxonMobil Holdings Corporation
Oil & Gas Integrated · $167.72 · beta 0.17
Why now
Oil & Gas Integrated · market cap $689.7b. 5% off the 52-week high of $176.41. 22 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $168.55 (implying +0% upside).
Moat
ROE 13% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. $689.7b market cap places it among the largest companies in the sector — distribution, R&D, and customer-acquisition costs amortize across a base peers can't replicate.
Risk
Production-cost sensitivity — top-quartile cost producers generate cash through the cycle while marginal producers burn it; watch the cost-per-unit trend, not just headline revenue.
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.

Where CHRD and XOM diverge

On the headline score the gap is 7.4 points in favor of CHRD. The widest single difference is Value, where CHRD leads by 20.7 points.

Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.