COMPARE · Data as of August 12, 2026
CHRD vs GPOR
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CHRD scored 63.0, GPOR scored 65.3 — GPOR leads.
Compare another set
CHRD
Chord Energy Corporation
63
$137.58 · $7.5B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
2.3
GPOR leads
GPOR
Gulfport Energy Corporation
65.3
$169.53 · $3.0B
fundamentals as of
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
CHRD
stronger →← stronger
GPOR
72
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
76
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
69
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
73
GPOR is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CHRD
GPOR
$1.2bC+
FCF
$250mC
+19.2%B+
Rev
+35.2%A
0.18A-
D/E
0.50B
9.3xA-
P/E
6.5xA
—
PEG
0.15A
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
CHRD
GPOR
48% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
45% below
~-17%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-2%/yr
+114%
1-yr DCF upside
+44%
+93%
5-yr DCF upside
+81%
+66%
10-yr DCF upside
+151%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
CHRD
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Cut its dividend
- Cyclical growth
GPOR
Why this score
- Cyclical growth
The companies
CHRDChord Energy Corporation
Why now
Oil & Gas E&P · market cap $7.5b. 9% off the 52-week high of $151.95. Revenue growing +19%, comfortably above the S&P median. 14 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $162.71 (implying +18% upside).
Moat
Net margin 13% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 10% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 140% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Production-cost sensitivity — top-quartile cost producers generate cash through the cycle while marginal producers burn it; watch the cost-per-unit trend, not just headline revenue.
GPORGulfport Energy Corporation
Why now
Oil & Gas E&P · market cap $3.0b. Down 25% from 52-week high of $225.78 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +35% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.15 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 12 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $227.25 (implying +34% upside).
Moat
Net margin 32% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 27% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Jurisdictional + permitting risk — mining and extraction operations concentrate exposure to political stability, royalty regimes, and environmental review timelines that can stall production for years.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where CHRD and GPOR diverge
On the headline score the gap is 2.3 points in favour of GPOR. The widest single difference is Quality, where GPOR leads by 4.2 points.
- QualityCHRD 72.2 · GPOR 76.4GPOR +4.2
- ValueCHRD 69.1 · GPOR 72.7GPOR +3.6
- GrowthCHRD 50.0 · GPOR 50.0level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.