COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
CHRD vs EXE
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CHRD scored 63.0, EXE scored 61.1 — CHRD leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. CHRD's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but EXE's are as of March 2026 — a 3-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
CHRD
Chord Energy Corporation
63
$147.85 · $8.1B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
1.9
CHRD leads
EXE
Expand Energy Corporation
61.1
$96.09 · $22.2B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestEXE8.3x
- Fastest growthEXE+167.8%
- Strongest balance sheetCHRD0.18
- Highest qualityEXE76 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueEXE-46%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
CHRD
stronger →← stronger
EXE
73
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
76
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
69
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
60
CHRD and EXE split the three pillars evenly.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CHRD
EXE
$1.2bC+
FCF
$3.0bB
+19.2%B+
Rev
+167.8%A
0.18A-
D/E
0.19A-
10.0xA-
P/E
8.3xA-
—
PEG
1.06B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
CHRD
EXE
44% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
46% below
~-15%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-13%/yr
+99%
1-yr DCF upside
+93%
+79%
5-yr DCF upside
+85%
+55%
10-yr DCF upside
+75%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
CHRD
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Cut its dividend
- Cyclical growth
EXE
Why this score
- Cut its dividend
- Cyclical growth
The companies
CHRDChord Energy Corporation
Why now
Oil & Gas E&P · market cap $8.1b. 3% off the 52-week high of $153.00. Revenue growing +19%, comfortably above the S&P median. 15 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $167.47 (implying +13% upside).
Moat
Net margin 13% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 10% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 140% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Production-cost sensitivity — top-quartile cost producers generate cash through the cycle while marginal producers burn it; watch the cost-per-unit trend, not just headline revenue.
EXEExpand Energy Corporation
Why now
Oil & Gas E&P · market cap $22.2b. Down 24% from 52-week high of $126.62 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +168% — in hypergrowth territory. 25 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $125.00 (implying +30% upside).
Moat
Net margin 23% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 17% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately.
Risk
Reserve-replacement treadmill — every barrel or ounce extracted has to be replaced through exploration or acquisition; underspending on replacement reserves shows up in production declines 2-3 years out.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where CHRD and EXE diverge
On the headline score the gap is 1.9 points in favor of CHRD. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- ValueCHRD 68.8 · EXE 59.9CHRD +8.9
- QualityCHRD 72.6 · EXE 76.0EXE +3.4
- GrowthCHRD 50.0 · EXE 50.0level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.