Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CHRD scored 60.2, EXE scored 64.9 — EXE leads.
Compare another set
CHRD
Chord Energy Corporation
Oil & Gas E&P · Quality-Growth
60.2
$141.54 · $7.7B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
4.7
EXE leads
EXE
Expand Energy Corporation
Oil & Gas E&P · Quality-Growth
64.9
$88.22 · $20.4B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
CheapestEXE7.6x
Fastest growthEXE+188.8%
Strongest balance sheetCHRD0.18
Highest qualityEXE76 / 100
Largest discount to fair valueEXE-49%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
CHRD
stronger →← stronger
EXE
73
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
76
44
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
69
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
72
EXE is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CHRD
EXE
$1.2bC+
FCF
$2.5bB
-7.1%D
Rev
+188.8%A
0.18A-
D/E
0.19A-
9.5xA-
P/E
7.6xA-
—
PEG
0.82B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
CHRD
EXE
46% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
49% below
~-16%/yr
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
~-10%/yr
+108%
1-yr DCF upside
+87%
+86%
5-yr DCF upside
+97%
+58%
10-yr DCF upside
+112%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
CHRD
Why this score
Buying back stock
Cut its dividend
EXE
Why this score
Buying back stock
Cut its dividend
Cyclical growth
The companies
CHRDChord Energy Corporation
Oil & Gas E&P · $141.54 · beta 0.47
Why now
Oil & Gas E&P · market cap $7.7b. 10% off the 52-week high of $157.06. Revenue -7% — in contraction; any catalyst that reverses this triggers re-rating. 16 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $174.44 (implying +23% upside).
Moat
Net margin 14% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 10% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 141% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash.
Risk
Revenue contracting -7% — the operational turn is not yet visible in the top line. Production-cost sensitivity — top-quartile cost producers generate cash through the cycle while marginal producers burn it; watch the cost-per-unit trend, not just headline revenue.
EXEExpand Energy Corporation
Oil & Gas E&P · $88.22 · beta 0.40
Why now
Oil & Gas E&P · market cap $20.4b. Down 30% from 52-week high of $126.62 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +189% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.82 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 27 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $123.22 (implying +40% upside).
Moat
Net margin 22% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 15% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Down 30% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Reserve-replacement treadmill — every barrel or ounce extracted has to be replaced through exploration or acquisition; underspending on replacement reserves shows up in production declines 2-3 years out.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where CHRD and EXE diverge
On the headline score the gap is 4.7 points in favor of EXE. The widest single difference is Growth, where EXE leads by 6.5 points.
GrowthCHRD 43.5 · EXE 50.0EXE +6.5
QualityCHRD 72.7 · EXE 75.7EXE +3.0
ValueCHRD 69.1 · EXE 72.1EXE +3.0
Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.
Common questions
Is EXE or CHRD the better stock?
EXE scores higher: EXE 64.9, CHRD 60.2 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
Where do EXE and CHRD differ most?
The widest gap is growth, where EXE leads by 7 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. EXE leads all three pillars, so the gap is broad rather than a single-measure difference.
How are EXE and CHRD scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.