COMPARE · Data as of August 12, 2026
CHRD vs EOG
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CHRD scored 63.0, EOG scored 62.3 — CHRD leads.
Compare another set
CHRD
Chord Energy Corporation
63
$137.58 · $7.5B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
0.7
CHRD leads
EOG
EOG Resources, Inc.
62.3
$143.14 · $75.1B
fundamentals as of
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
CHRD
stronger →← stronger
EOG
72
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
89
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
69
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
54
CHRD and EOG split the three pillars evenly.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CHRD
EOG
$1.2bC+
FCF
$4.0bB
+19.2%B+
Rev
+19.1%B+
0.18A-
D/E
0.26A-
9.3xA-
P/E
11.2xB+
—
PEG
1.07B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
CHRD
EOG
48% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
55% above
~-17%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~9%/yr
+114%
1-yr DCF upside
-28%
+93%
5-yr DCF upside
-36%
+66%
10-yr DCF upside
-44%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
CHRD
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Cut its dividend
- Cyclical growth
EOG
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
- Cyclical growth
The companies
CHRDChord Energy Corporation
Why now
Oil & Gas E&P · market cap $7.5b. 9% off the 52-week high of $151.95. Revenue growing +19%, comfortably above the S&P median. 14 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $162.71 (implying +18% upside).
Moat
Net margin 13% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 10% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 140% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Production-cost sensitivity — top-quartile cost producers generate cash through the cycle while marginal producers burn it; watch the cost-per-unit trend, not just headline revenue.
EOGEOG Resources, Inc.
Why now
Oil & Gas E&P · market cap $75.1b. 6% off the 52-week high of $151.87. Revenue growing +19%, comfortably above the S&P median. 27 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $158.85 (implying +11% upside).
Moat
Net margin 25% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 22% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. $75.1b market cap gives the company enough scale to absorb fixed costs that subscale competitors can't, without yet being so large that growth has to come from acquisition.
Risk
Commodity exposure — earnings power tracks the price of the underlying commodity, not management execution. A 15-20% move in the commodity reprices the equity well before fundamentals catch up.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where CHRD and EOG diverge
On the headline score the gap is 0.7 points in favour of CHRD. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- QualityCHRD 72.2 · EOG 89.1EOG +16.9
- ValueCHRD 69.1 · EOG 54.3CHRD +14.8
- GrowthCHRD 50.0 · EOG 50.0level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.