COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026

CHRD vs CRK

Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CHRD scored 63.0, CRK scored 44.6 — CHRD leads.
Compare another set
CHRD
Chord Energy Corporation
Oil & Gas E&P · Quality-Growth
63
$147.85 · $8.1B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
18.4
CHRD leads
CRK
Comstock Resources, Inc.
Oil & Gas E&P · Quality-Growth
44.6
$14.22 · $4.2B
fundamentals as of
  • Fastest growthCRK+31.6%
  • Strongest balance sheetCHRD0.18
  • Highest qualityCHRD73 / 100
  • Largest discount to fair valueCHRD-44%
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD63.0/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY72.6GROWTH50.0VALUE68.8
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD44.6/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY51.2GROWTH50.0VALUE34.6
CHRDCRKQuality72.651.2Growth50.050.0Value68.834.6
FCFCHRD$1.2bCRK-$735m
RevCHRD+19.2%CRK+31.6%
D/ECHRD0.18CRK1.00
CHRD
stronger →← stronger
CRK
73
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
51
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
69
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
35
CHRD is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
CHRD
CRK
$1.2bC+
FCF
-$735mF
+19.2%B+
Rev
+31.6%A
0.18A-
D/E
1.00C
10.0xA-
P/E
PEG
4.64D
P/S
1.9xB
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
CHRD
CRK
44% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
~-15%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
+99%
1-yr DCF upside
+79%
5-yr DCF upside
+55%
10-yr DCF upside
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
CHRD
Why this score
  • Buying back stock
  • Cut its dividend
  • Cyclical growth
CRK
Why this score
  • Cyclical growth
CHRDChord Energy Corporation
Oil & Gas E&P · $147.85 · beta 0.38
Why now
Oil & Gas E&P · market cap $8.1b. 3% off the 52-week high of $153.00. Revenue growing +19%, comfortably above the S&P median. 15 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $167.47 (implying +13% upside).
Moat
Net margin 13% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 10% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 140% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Production-cost sensitivity — top-quartile cost producers generate cash through the cycle while marginal producers burn it; watch the cost-per-unit trend, not just headline revenue.
CRKComstock Resources, Inc.
Oil & Gas E&P · $14.22 · beta 0.13
Why now
Oil & Gas E&P · market cap $4.2b. Down 49% from 52-week high of $28.10 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +32% — in hypergrowth territory. 12 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $15.04 (implying +6% upside).
Moat
Net margin 23% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 20% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately.
Risk
Free cash flow is negative (-$735m) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk. Down 49% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Hedge-book exposure — many commodity producers hedge forward production; if the hedge book is concentrated at prices well below spot, the upside the market expects is already locked away.
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.

Where CHRD and CRK diverge

On the headline score the gap is 18.4 points in favor of CHRD. The widest single difference is Value, where CHRD leads by 34.2 points.

Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.