COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
CHRD vs COP
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CHRD scored 63.0, COP scored 56.5 — CHRD leads.
Compare another set
CHRD
Chord Energy Corporation
63
$147.85 · $8.1B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
6.5
CHRD leads
COP
ConocoPhillips
56.5
$134.87 · $162.0B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestCHRD10.0x
- Fastest growthCHRD+19.2%
- Strongest balance sheetCHRD0.18
- Highest qualityCOP86 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueCHRD-44%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
CHRD
stronger →← stronger
COP
73
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
86
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
69
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
42
CHRD and COP split the three pillars evenly.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CHRD
COP
$1.2bC+
FCF
$11.8bA-
+19.2%B+
Rev
+9.2%B
0.18A-
D/E
0.36B+
10.0xA-
P/E
17.8xB
—
PEG
1.03B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
CHRD
COP
44% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
13% above
~-15%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~1%/yr
+99%
1-yr DCF upside
-1%
+79%
5-yr DCF upside
-11%
+55%
10-yr DCF upside
-23%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
CHRD
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Cut its dividend
- Cyclical growth
COP
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
- Cyclical growth
The companies
CHRDChord Energy Corporation
Why now
Oil & Gas E&P · market cap $8.1b. 3% off the 52-week high of $153.00. Revenue growing +19%, comfortably above the S&P median. 15 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $167.47 (implying +13% upside).
Moat
Net margin 13% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 10% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 140% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Production-cost sensitivity — top-quartile cost producers generate cash through the cycle while marginal producers burn it; watch the cost-per-unit trend, not just headline revenue.
COPConocoPhillips
Why now
Oil & Gas E&P · market cap $162.0b. Trading near 52-week high of $135.88 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. 24 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $144.29 (implying +7% upside).
Moat
Net margin 16% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 14% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 127% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trading within 1% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction. Hedge-book exposure — many commodity producers hedge forward production; if the hedge book is concentrated at prices well below spot, the upside the market expects is already locked away.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where CHRD and COP diverge
On the headline score the gap is 6.5 points in favor of CHRD. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- ValueCHRD 68.8 · COP 42.0CHRD +26.8
- QualityCHRD 72.6 · COP 85.8COP +13.2
- GrowthCHRD 50.0 · COP 50.0level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.