COMPARE · Data as of August 24, 2026
CHDN vs YETI
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CHDN scored 51.6, YETI scored 67.8 — YETI leads.
Compare another set
CHDN
Churchill Downs Incorporated
51.6
$90.71 · $6.3B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
16.2
YETI leads
YETI
YETI Holdings, Inc.
67.8
$43.08 · $3.1B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestCHDN15.4x
- Fastest growthYETI+6.2%
- Strongest balance sheetYETI0.42
- Highest qualityYETI89 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
CHDN
stronger →← stronger
YETI
63
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
89
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
44
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
70
YETI is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CHDN
YETI
$95mC-
FCF
$257mC
+5.7%C+
Rev
+6.2%C+
3.49C
D/E
0.42A-
15.4xB+
P/E
19.2xB
1.69C+
PEG
1.27B
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
CHDN
YETI
208% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
4% above
~33%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~10%/yr
-69%
1-yr DCF upside
-15%
-68%
5-yr DCF upside
-4%
-65%
10-yr DCF upside
+13%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
CHDN
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
- Cyclical growth
YETI
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Durable high returns
- Cyclical growth
The companies
CHDNChurchill Downs Incorporated
Why now
Gambling · market cap $6.3b. Down 23% from 52-week high of $118.35 — deep drawdown territory. 11 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $131.64 (implying +45% upside).
Moat
Net margin 14% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 31% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
D/E 3.49 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer.
YETIYETI Holdings, Inc.
Why now
Leisure · market cap $3.1b. Down 20% from 52-week high of $53.99 — deep drawdown territory. 15 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $54.53 (implying +27% upside).
Moat
ROE 29% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 144% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Beta 1.72 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where CHDN and YETI diverge
On the headline score the gap is 16.2 points in favor of YETI. The widest single difference is Quality, where YETI leads by 26.7 points.
- QualityCHDN 62.7 · YETI 89.4YETI +26.7
- ValueCHDN 43.7 · YETI 69.6YETI +25.9
- GrowthCHDN 50.0 · YETI 50.0level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.