COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026

CGNX vs TDY

Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CGNX scored 54.9, TDY scored 59.3 — TDY leads.
Compare another set
CGNX
Cognex Corporation
Scientific & Technical Instruments · Quality-Growth
54.9
$60.54 · $10.2B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
4.4
TDY leads
TDY
Teledyne Technologies Incorpora
Scientific & Technical Instruments · Quality-Growth
59.3
$629.15 · $29.2B
fundamentals as of
  • CheapestTDY30.4x
  • Fastest growthCGNX+17.1%
  • Strongest balance sheetCGNX0.04
  • Highest qualityCGNX73 / 100
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD54.9/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY73.1GROWTH79.3VALUE28.6
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD59.3/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY63.9GROWTH76.5VALUE42.6
CGNXTDYQuality73.163.9Growth79.376.5Value28.642.6
cheap & fastrevenue growth →← cheaper (lower multiple)-2%27%25x63xCGNXTDY

Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.

FCFCGNX$268mTDY$1.1b
RevCGNX+17.1%TDY+7.9%
D/ECGNX0.04TDY0.19
P/ECGNX58.2xTDY30.4x
PEGCGNX2.71TDY1.40
CGNX
stronger →← stronger
TDY
73
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
64
79
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
77
29
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
43
CGNX is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
CGNX
TDY
$268mC
FCF
$1.1bC+
+17.1%B+
Rev
+7.9%B
0.04A-
D/E
0.19B+
58.2xC
P/E
30.4xB
2.71C
PEG
1.40B
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
CGNX
TDY
153% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
45% above
~38%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~15%/yr
-68%
1-yr DCF upside
-35%
-60%
5-yr DCF upside
-31%
-48%
10-yr DCF upside
-24%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
CGNX
Why this score
  • Raising its dividend
TDY
No notable signals flagged.
CGNXCognex Corporation
Scientific & Technical Instruments · $60.54 · beta 1.50
Why now
Scientific & Technical Instruments · market cap $10.2b. 17% off the 52-week high of $72.88. Revenue growing +17%, comfortably above the S&P median. 19 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $80.05 (implying +32% upside).
Moat
Net margin 16% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 11% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 153% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trailing P/E 58.2x prices in sustained high growth — any quarter that disappoints triggers sharp re-rating. Beta 1.50 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
TDYTeledyne Technologies Incorpora
Scientific & Technical Instruments · $629.15 · beta 0.92
Why now
Scientific & Technical Instruments · market cap $29.2b. 10% off the 52-week high of $697.67. 12 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $757.25 (implying +20% upside).
Moat
Net margin 15% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. FCF converts 117% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trailing P/E 30x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.

Where CGNX and TDY diverge

On the headline score the gap is 4.4 points in favor of TDY. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.

Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.