Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CEPU scored 66.0, NEE scored 58.3 — CEPU leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. CEPU's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but NEE's are as of March 2026 — a 3-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
CEPU
Central Puerto S.A.
Utilities - Regulated Electric · Quality-Growth
66
$12.64 · $1.9B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
7.7
CEPU leads
NEE
NextEra Energy, Inc.
Utilities - Regulated Electric · Quality-Growth
58.3
$77.38 · $161.4B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
CheapestCEPU5.5x
Fastest growthCEPU+13.0%
Strongest balance sheetCEPU0.33
Highest qualityCEPU70 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
CEPU
stronger →← stronger
NEE
70
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
60
86
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
66
86
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
50
CEPU is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CEPU
NEE
$40mC-
FCF
$3.0bB
+13.0%B+
Rev
+8.3%B
0.33A
D/E
1.62C+
5.5xA
P/E
17.4xB+
—
PEG
1.58C+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
CEPU
NEE
158% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
129% above
~34%/yr
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
~27%/yr
-66%
1-yr DCF upside
-59%
-61%
5-yr DCF upside
-56%
-54%
10-yr DCF upside
-52%
These two disagree on this pair: the Value pillar ranks cheapness against sector peers, while price-vs-fair-value is an absolute read. A name can be the better value in its sector and still the dearer one on cash flows.
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
CEPU
Why this score
Cut its dividend
Foreign reporter (ARS)
NEE
Why this score
Raising its dividend
The companies
CEPUCentral Puerto S.A.
Utilities - Regulated Electric · $12.64 · beta -0.18
Why now
Utilities - Regulated Electric · market cap $1.9b. Down 32% from 52-week high of $18.50 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +13%, comfortably above the S&P median. 5 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $23.81 (implying +88% upside).
Moat
Net margin 29% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 19% is above 15% — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately.
Risk
Down 32% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
NEENextEra Energy, Inc.
Utilities - Regulated Electric · $77.38 · beta 0.64
Why now
Utilities - Regulated Electric · market cap $161.4b. Down 22% from 52-week high of $98.75 — deep drawdown territory. 19 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $97.05 (implying +25% upside).
Moat
Net margin 31% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 15% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. $161.4b market cap gives the company enough scale to absorb fixed costs that subscale competitors can't, without yet being so large that growth has to come from acquisition.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where CEPU and NEE diverge
On the headline score the gap is 7.7 points in favor of CEPU. The widest single difference is Value, where CEPU leads by 35.9 points.
ValueCEPU 86.0 · NEE 50.1CEPU +35.9
GrowthCEPU 86.2 · NEE 66.3CEPU +19.9
QualityCEPU 70.2 · NEE 59.8CEPU +10.4
Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.
Common questions
Is CEPU or NEE the better stock?
CEPU scores higher: CEPU 66.0, NEE 58.3 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
Where do CEPU and NEE differ most?
The widest gap is value, where CEPU leads by 36 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. CEPU leads all three pillars, so the gap is broad rather than a single-measure difference.
How are CEPU and NEE scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.