COMPARE · Reviewed July 29, 2026
CELH vs POST
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CELH scored 74.1, POST scored 67.6 — CELH leads.
Compare another set
CELH
Celsius Holdings, Inc.
74.1
$29.20 · $7.5B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
6.5
CELH leads
POST
Post Holdings, Inc.
67.6
$93.44 · $4.2B
fundamentals as of
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
CELH
stronger →← stronger
POST
66
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
54
100
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
79
62
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
72
CELH is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CELH
POST
$293mC
FCF
$517mC+
+123.3%A
Rev
+7.2%B
0.22A-
D/E
2.38C
67.9xD
P/E
15.7xA-
0.29A
PEG
1.17B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
CELH
POST
6% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
53% below
~15%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-11%/yr
-27%
1-yr DCF upside
+93%
-6%
5-yr DCF upside
+114%
+36%
10-yr DCF upside
+147%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
CELH
No notable signals flagged.
POST
Why this score
- Buying back stock
The companies
CELHCelsius Holdings, Inc.
Why now
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic · market cap $7.5b. Down 56% from 52-week high of $66.74 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +123% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.29 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 21 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $55.24 (implying +89% upside).
Moat
ROE 14% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 169% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trailing P/E 67.9x prices in sustained high growth — any quarter that disappoints triggers sharp re-rating. Down 56% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
POSTPost Holdings, Inc.
Why now
Packaged Foods · market cap $4.2b. Down 20% from 52-week high of $117.28 — deep drawdown territory. 6 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $115.83 (implying +24% upside).
Moat
ROE 11% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 153% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
D/E 2.38 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Net margin 4.0% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.