COMPARE · Data as of August 24, 2026
CDW vs G
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CDW scored 71.1, G scored 75.9 — G leads.
Compare another set
CDW
CDW Corporation
71.1
$134.03 · $16.8B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
4.8
G leads
G
Genpact Limited
75.9
$37.59 · $6.3B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestG11.1x
- Fastest growthCDW+7.4%
- Strongest balance sheetG0.54
- Highest qualityG80 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueG-57%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
CDW
stronger →← stronger
G
73
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
80
69
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
73
71
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
75
G is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CDW
G
$860mC+
FCF
$572mC+
+7.4%B
Rev
+6.5%C+
2.63D
D/E
0.54C+
16.1xA-
P/E
11.1xA
1.33B
PEG
1.16B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
CDW
G
10% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
57% below
~9%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-12%/yr
-16%
1-yr DCF upside
+113%
-9%
5-yr DCF upside
+132%
+2%
10-yr DCF upside
+164%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
CDW
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Durable high returns
G
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
The companies
CDWCDW Corporation
Why now
Information Technology Services · market cap $16.8b. Down 22% from 52-week high of $171.55 — deep drawdown territory. 9 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $155.89 (implying +16% upside).
Moat
ROE 44% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
D/E 2.63 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Net margin 4.6% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
GGenpact Limited
Why now
Information Technology Services · market cap $6.3b. Down 23% from 52-week high of $48.64 — deep drawdown territory. 11 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $42.18 (implying +12% upside).
Moat
ROE 22% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 98% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where CDW and G diverge
On the headline score the gap is 4.8 points in favor of G. The widest single difference is Quality, where G leads by 6.8 points.
- QualityCDW 73.3 · G 80.1G +6.8
- ValueCDW 71.1 · G 75.0G +3.9
- GrowthCDW 68.9 · G 72.7G +3.8
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.