COMPARE · Data as of August 24, 2026
ACN vs CDW
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. ACN scored 78.4, CDW scored 71.1 — ACN leads.
Compare another set
ACN
Accenture plc
78.4
$187.03 · $114.5B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
7.3
ACN leads
CDW
CDW Corporation
71.1
$134.03 · $16.8B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestACN14.9x
- Fastest growthCDW+7.4%
- Strongest balance sheetACN0.25
- Highest qualityACN89 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueACN-39%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
ACN
stronger →← stronger
CDW
89
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
73
71
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
69
77
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
71
ACN is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
ACN
CDW
$12.6bA-
FCF
$860mC+
+6.7%C+
Rev
+7.4%B
0.25B
D/E
2.63D
14.9xA-
P/E
16.1xA-
1.33B
PEG
1.33B
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
ACN
CDW
39% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
10% above
~-7%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~9%/yr
+57%
1-yr DCF upside
-16%
+63%
5-yr DCF upside
-9%
+71%
10-yr DCF upside
+2%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
ACN
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
CDW
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Durable high returns
The companies
ACNAccenture plc
Why now
Information Technology Services · market cap $114.5b. Down 36% from 52-week high of $291.09 — deep drawdown territory. 25 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $179.11 (implying -4% upside).
Moat
ROE 24% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 162% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined. $114.5b market cap gives the company enough scale to absorb fixed costs that subscale competitors can't, without yet being so large that growth has to come from acquisition.
Risk
Down 36% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
CDWCDW Corporation
Why now
Information Technology Services · market cap $16.8b. Down 22% from 52-week high of $171.55 — deep drawdown territory. 9 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $155.89 (implying +16% upside).
Moat
ROE 44% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
D/E 2.63 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Net margin 4.6% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where ACN and CDW diverge
On the headline score the gap is 7.3 points in favor of ACN. The widest single difference is Quality, where ACN leads by 15.2 points.
- QualityACN 88.5 · CDW 73.3ACN +15.2
- ValueACN 76.9 · CDW 71.1ACN +5.8
- GrowthACN 70.7 · CDW 68.9level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.