COMPARE · Data as of August 28, 2026
ARE vs CDP
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. ARE scored 64.0, CDP scored 73.0 — CDP leads.
Compare another set
ARE
Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.
76.3Fin
$51.57 · $8.9B
fundamentals as of
Strength gap
13.2
ARE leads
CDP
COPT Defense Properties
63.1Fin
$36.59 · $4.2B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- Fastest growthCDP+1.4%
- Strongest balance sheetARE0.69
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Fundamentals, head-to-head
ARE
CDP
5.4%A-
Yield
3.4%B
-3.4%D+
Rev
+1.4%C
0.69A-
D/E
1.64C
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
The companies
AREAlexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.
Why now
REIT - Office · market cap $8.9b. Down 42% from 52-week high of $88.24 — deep drawdown territory. 14 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $53.00 (implying +3% upside).
Moat
Turnaround / out-of-favor name — GAAP-unprofitable for now, so the durability case is forward-looking: it rests on a recovery (margin normalization, a cyclical upturn or restructuring) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than on current reported results.
Risk
Currently unprofitable (margin -36.1%) — path to GAAP profitability is the core thesis risk. Down 42% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Dividend payout 689% of earnings on a 5.4% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut.
CDPCOPT Defense Properties
Why now
REIT - Office · market cap $4.2b. 6% off the 52-week high of $38.90. 8 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $40.00 (implying +9% upside).
Moat
Net margin 21% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 11% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.