COMPARE · Data as of August 24, 2026
CCU vs TSN
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CCU scored 58.7, TSN scored 45.3 — CCU leads.
Compare another set
CCU
Compañía Cervecerías Unidas S.A.
58.7
$12.66 · $2.3B
Score gap
13.4
CCU leads
TSN
Tyson Foods, Inc.
45.3
$57.87 · $20.4B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestCCU20.4x
- Fastest growthCCU+13.2%
- Strongest balance sheetTSN0.44
- Highest qualityCCU66 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueCCU-23%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
CCU
stronger →← stronger
TSN
66
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
49
84
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
38
50
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
50
CCU is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CCU
TSN
$150mC
FCF
$1.2bC+
+13.2%B+
Rev
+2.9%C
0.82B
D/E
0.44B+
20.4xB
P/E
36.2xC
1.73C+
PEG
1.04B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
CCU
TSN
23% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
5% below
~5%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~7%/yr
+7%
1-yr DCF upside
-8%
+30%
5-yr DCF upside
+5%
+70%
10-yr DCF upside
+27%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
CCU
Why this score
- Durable high returns
- Cut its dividend
- Foreign reporter (CLP)
TSN
No notable signals flagged.
The companies
CCUCompañía Cervecerías Unidas S.A.
Why now
Beverages - Brewers · market cap $2.3b. 18% off the 52-week high of $15.36. Revenue growing +13%, comfortably above the S&P median. 6 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $11.64 (implying -8% upside).
Moat
ROE 11% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
TSNTyson Foods, Inc.
Why now
Farm Products · market cap $20.4b. 17% off the 52-week high of $69.48. 12 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $68.75 (implying +19% upside).
Moat
Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
Trailing P/E 36x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates. Net margin 1.0% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first. ROE 3% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where CCU and TSN diverge
On the headline score the gap is 13.4 points in favor of CCU. The widest single difference is Growth, where CCU leads by 46.2 points.
- GrowthCCU 84.2 · TSN 38.0CCU +46.2
- QualityCCU 65.6 · TSN 49.3CCU +16.3
- ValueCCU 50.3 · TSN 49.5level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.