Is CCU or MDLZ the better stock?

CCU scores higher: CCU 58.7, MDLZ 57.7 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.

Where do CCU and MDLZ differ most?

The widest gap is growth, where CCU leads by 9 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. CCU leads all three pillars, so the gap is broad rather than a single-measure difference.

How are CCU and MDLZ scored?

Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.

How current is this comparison?

The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.

COMPARE · Data as of August 24, 2026

CCU vs MDLZ

Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CCU scored 58.7, MDLZ scored 57.7 — CCU leads.

Compare another set

CCU

Compañía Cervecerías Unidas S.A.

Beverages - Brewers · Quality-Growth

58.7

$12.66 · $2.3B

Score gap

1.0

CCU leads

MDLZ

Mondelez International, Inc.

Confectioners · Quality-Growth

57.7

$64.70 · $82.6B

fundamentals as of Mar 2026

At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules

CheapestCCU20.4x
Fastest growthCCU+13.2%
Strongest balance sheetCCU0.82
Highest qualityCCU66 / 100
Largest discount to fair valueCCU-23%

Side by side · every name on one set of axes

Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.

The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)

CCU

stronger →← stronger

MDLZ

Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet

Growthrevenue & earnings expansion

Valuevaluation vs sector peers

CCU is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.

Fundamentals, head-to-head

CCU

MDLZ

$150mC

FCF

$2.6bB

+13.2%B+

Rev

+7.8%B

0.82B

D/E

0.83B

20.4xB

P/E

23.6xB

1.73C+

PEG

1.07B+

Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.

Valuation · DCF cross-check

CCU

MDLZ

23% below

Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper

85% above

~5%/yr

Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in

~23%/yr

+7%

1-yr DCF upside

-51%

+30%

5-yr DCF upside

-46%

+70%

10-yr DCF upside

-38%

The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.

Model signals

CCU

Why this score

Durable high returns
Cut its dividend
Foreign reporter (CLP)

MDLZ

Why this score

Raising its dividend

The companies

CCUCompañía Cervecerías Unidas S.A.

Beverages - Brewers · $12.66 · beta 0.27

Why now

Beverages - Brewers · market cap $2.3b. 18% off the 52-week high of $15.36. Revenue growing +13%, comfortably above the S&P median. 6 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $11.64 (implying -8% upside).

Moat

ROE 11% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.

Risk

Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.

MDLZMondelez International, Inc.

Confectioners · $64.70 · beta 0.40

Why now

Confectioners · market cap $82.6b. Trading near 52-week high of $66.65 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. 23 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $69.13 (implying +7% upside).

Moat

ROE 10% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 99% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined. $82.6b market cap gives the company enough scale to absorb fixed costs that subscale competitors can't, without yet being so large that growth has to come from acquisition.

Risk

Trading within 3% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction.

Verdict — model-derived comparison

Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds

Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.

Where CCU and MDLZ diverge

On the headline score the gap is 1.0 points in favor of CCU. The widest single difference is Growth, where CCU leads by 8.6 points.

GrowthCCU 84.2 · MDLZ 75.6CCU +8.6
QualityCCU 65.6 · MDLZ 57.7CCU +7.9
ValueCCU 50.3 · MDLZ 43.9CCU +6.4

Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.