COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
CCU vs LRN
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CCU scored 39.0, LRN scored 81.9 — LRN leads.
Compare another set
CCU
Compania Cervecerias Unidas SA
39
$12.34 · $2.1T
Score gap
42.9
LRN leads
LRN
Stride, Inc.
81.9
$84.36 · $3.5B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestLRN11.8x
- Fastest growthLRN+4.7%
- Strongest balance sheetLRN0.33
- Highest qualityLRN86 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueLRN-49%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
CCU
stronger →← stronger
LRN
62
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
86
15
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
67
65
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
96
LRN is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CCU
LRN
—
FCF
$433mC
-3.0%D+
Rev
+4.7%C+
0.86B
D/E
0.33A-
19.2xB
P/E
11.8xA
—
PEG
0.49A
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
CCU
LRN
—
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
49% below
—
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-11%/yr
—
1-yr DCF upside
+88%
—
5-yr DCF upside
+96%
—
10-yr DCF upside
+108%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
CCU
Why this score
- Durable high returns
- Cut its dividend
LRN
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Durable high returns
The companies
CCUCompania Cervecerias Unidas SA
Why now
Beverages · market cap $2.1T. Down 100% from 52-week high of $6598.30 — deep drawdown territory.
Moat
$2.1T market cap places it among the largest companies in the sector — distribution, R&D, and customer-acquisition costs amortize across a base peers can't replicate.
Risk
Down 100% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Net margin 3.5% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first. ROE 7% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
LRNStride, Inc.
Why now
Education & Training Services · market cap $3.5b. Down 51% from 52-week high of $171.17 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.49 — paying under fair value for the growth rate.
Moat
Net margin 13% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 21% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 128% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Down 51% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where CCU and LRN diverge
On the headline score the gap is 42.9 points in favor of LRN. The widest single difference is Growth, where LRN leads by 52.2 points.
- GrowthCCU 14.7 · LRN 66.9LRN +52.2
- ValueCCU 65.1 · LRN 95.7LRN +30.6
- QualityCCU 62.2 · LRN 86.1LRN +23.9
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.