COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
CCU vs LAUR
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CCU scored 39.0, LAUR scored 74.5 — LAUR leads.
Compare another set
CCU
Compania Cervecerias Unidas SA
39
$12.34 · $2.1T
Score gap
35.5
LAUR leads
LAUR
Laureate Education, Inc.
74.5
$37.46 · $5.2B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestLAUR17.0x
- Fastest growthLAUR+17.9%
- Strongest balance sheetLAUR0.64
- Highest qualityLAUR91 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueLAUR-5%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
CCU
stronger →← stronger
LAUR
62
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
91
15
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
80
65
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
57
LAUR is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CCU
LAUR
—
FCF
$287mC
-3.0%D+
Rev
+17.9%B+
0.86B
D/E
0.64B+
19.2xB
P/E
17.0xB+
—
PEG
1.23B
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
CCU
LAUR
—
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
5% below
—
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~8%/yr
—
1-yr DCF upside
-9%
—
5-yr DCF upside
+5%
—
10-yr DCF upside
+30%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
CCU
Why this score
- Durable high returns
- Cut its dividend
LAUR
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Durable high returns
The companies
CCUCompania Cervecerias Unidas SA
Why now
Beverages · market cap $2.1T. Down 100% from 52-week high of $6598.30 — deep drawdown territory.
Moat
$2.1T market cap places it among the largest companies in the sector — distribution, R&D, and customer-acquisition costs amortize across a base peers can't replicate.
Risk
Down 100% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Net margin 3.5% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first. ROE 7% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
LAURLaureate Education, Inc.
Why now
Education & Training Services · market cap $5.2b. 8% off the 52-week high of $40.92. Revenue growing +18%, comfortably above the S&P median. 7 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $41.21 (implying +10% upside).
Moat
Net margin 18% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 28% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where CCU and LAUR diverge
On the headline score the gap is 35.5 points in favor of LAUR. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- GrowthCCU 14.7 · LAUR 80.5LAUR +65.8
- QualityCCU 62.2 · LAUR 91.0LAUR +28.8
- ValueCCU 65.1 · LAUR 56.6CCU +8.5
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.