COMPARE · Data as of August 24, 2026
CCU vs KHC
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CCU scored 58.7, KHC scored 37.1 — CCU leads.
Compare another set
CCU
Compañía Cervecerías Unidas S.A.
58.7
$12.66 · $2.3B
Score gap
21.6
CCU leads
KHC
The Kraft Heinz Company
37.1
$25.67 · $30.4B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- Fastest growthCCU+13.2%
- Strongest balance sheetKHC0.53
- Highest qualityCCU66 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueKHC-44%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
CCU
stronger →← stronger
KHC
66
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
44
84
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
14
50
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
82
CCU is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CCU
KHC
$150mC
FCF
$3.8bB
+13.2%B+
Rev
-1.6%D+
0.82B
D/E
0.53B+
20.4xB
P/E
—
1.73C+
PEG
0.99B+
—
P/S
1.2xB
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
CCU
KHC
23% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
44% below
~5%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-12%/yr
+7%
1-yr DCF upside
+83%
+30%
5-yr DCF upside
+80%
+70%
10-yr DCF upside
+77%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
CCU
Why this score
- Durable high returns
- Cut its dividend
- Foreign reporter (CLP)
KHC
No notable signals flagged.
The companies
CCUCompañía Cervecerías Unidas S.A.
Why now
Beverages - Brewers · market cap $2.3b. 18% off the 52-week high of $15.36. Revenue growing +13%, comfortably above the S&P median. 6 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $11.64 (implying -8% upside).
Moat
ROE 11% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
KHCThe Kraft Heinz Company
Why now
Packaged Foods · market cap $30.4b. 9% off the 52-week high of $28.09. PEG 0.99 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 17 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $25.09 (implying -2% upside).
Moat
Turnaround / out-of-favor name — GAAP-unprofitable for now, so the durability case is forward-looking: it rests on a recovery (margin normalization, a cyclical upturn or restructuring) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than on current reported results.
Risk
Currently unprofitable (margin -13.6%) — path to GAAP profitability is the core thesis risk. Dividend payout 73% of earnings on a 6.3% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut. ROE -9% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where CCU and KHC diverge
On the headline score the gap is 21.6 points in favor of CCU. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- GrowthCCU 84.2 · KHC 14.1CCU +70.1
- ValueCCU 50.3 · KHC 81.6KHC +31.3
- QualityCCU 65.6 · KHC 44.2CCU +21.4
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.