COMPARE · Data as of August 28, 2026
CCS vs VTMX
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CCS scored 67.0, VTMX scored 81.0 — VTMX leads.
Compare another set
CCS
Century Communities, Inc.
71.2Fin
$69.16 · $2.0B
fundamentals as of
Strength gap
11.1
VTMX leads
VTMX
Corporación Inmobiliaria Vesta, S.A.B. de C.V.
82.3Fin
$33.93 · $3.1B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- Fastest growthVTMX+12.2%
- Strongest balance sheetVTMX0.37
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CCS
VTMX
1.8%C+
Yield
2.4%B
-8.9%D
Rev
+12.2%B+
0.66A-
D/E
0.37A
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
CCS
VTMX
465% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
—
~45%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
—
-80%
1-yr DCF upside
—
-82%
5-yr DCF upside
—
-85%
10-yr DCF upside
—
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
The companies
CCSCentury Communities, Inc.
Why now
Real Estate - Development · market cap $2.0b. 9% off the 52-week high of $76.00. Revenue -9% — in contraction; any catalyst that reverses this triggers re-rating.
Moat
Moat signals from the quantitative card are modest — profitability and capital efficiency are middle-of-pack. The thesis here depends on softer factors (switching costs, brand, distribution, regulatory protection) not captured by the quality-growth screen.
Risk
Revenue contracting -9% — the operational turn is not yet visible in the top line. Net margin 3.4% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first. ROE 5% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
VTMXCorporación Inmobiliaria Vesta, S.A.B. de C.V.
Why now
Real Estate - Diversified · market cap $3.1b. 9% off the 52-week high of $37.41. Revenue growing +12%, comfortably above the S&P median. 4 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $36.90 (implying +9% upside).
Moat
ROE 14% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
P/S 10.3x embeds aggressive forward growth — disappointing top-line guidance would compress the multiple hard.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.