COMPARE · Data as of August 28, 2026
CCS vs HHH
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CCS scored 67.0, HHH scored 71.0 — HHH leads.
Compare another set
CCS
Century Communities, Inc.
71.2Fin
$69.16 · $2.0B
fundamentals as of
Strength gap
12.6
CCS leads
HHH
Howard Hughes Holdings Inc.
58.6Fin
$64.80 · $3.9B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- Fastest growthCCS-8.9%
- Strongest balance sheetCCS0.66
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CCS
HHH
1.8%C+
Yield
0.0%C
-8.9%D
Rev
-15.8%F
0.66A-
D/E
1.35C+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
CCS
HHH
465% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
—
~45%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
—
-80%
1-yr DCF upside
—
-82%
5-yr DCF upside
—
-85%
10-yr DCF upside
—
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
The companies
CCSCentury Communities, Inc.
Why now
Real Estate - Development · market cap $2.0b. 9% off the 52-week high of $76.00. Revenue -9% — in contraction; any catalyst that reverses this triggers re-rating.
Moat
Moat signals from the quantitative card are modest — profitability and capital efficiency are middle-of-pack. The thesis here depends on softer factors (switching costs, brand, distribution, regulatory protection) not captured by the quality-growth screen.
Risk
Revenue contracting -9% — the operational turn is not yet visible in the top line. Net margin 3.4% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first. ROE 5% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
HHHHoward Hughes Holdings Inc.
Why now
Real Estate - Development · market cap $3.9b. Down 29% from 52-week high of $91.07 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue -16% — in contraction; any catalyst that reverses this triggers re-rating. 3 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $89.67 (implying +38% upside).
Moat
Net margin 12% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent.
Risk
Revenue contracting -16% — the operational turn is not yet visible in the top line. ROE 7% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.