COMPARE · Data as of August 28, 2026
BEKE vs CCS
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. BEKE scored 76.0, CCS scored 67.0 — BEKE leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. CCS's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but BEKE's are as of March 2026 — a 3-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
BEKE
KE Holdings Inc.
55.4Fin
$18.32 · $20.2B
fundamentals as of
Strength gap
15.8
CCS leads
CCS
Century Communities, Inc.
71.2Fin
$69.16 · $2.0B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- Fastest growthBEKE+1.2%
- Strongest balance sheetBEKE0.22
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Fundamentals, head-to-head
BEKE
CCS
1.6%C+
Yield
1.8%C+
+1.2%C
Rev
-8.9%D
0.22A
D/E
0.66A-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
BEKE
CCS
—
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
465% above
—
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~45%/yr
—
1-yr DCF upside
-80%
—
5-yr DCF upside
-82%
—
10-yr DCF upside
-85%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
The companies
BEKEKE Holdings Inc.
Why now
Real Estate Services · market cap $20.2b. 13% off the 52-week high of $20.98. PEG 0.52 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 21 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $23.61 (implying +29% upside).
Moat
Moat signals from the quantitative card are modest — profitability and capital efficiency are middle-of-pack. The thesis here depends on softer factors (switching costs, brand, distribution, regulatory protection) not captured by the quality-growth screen.
Risk
ROE 7% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
CCSCentury Communities, Inc.
Why now
Real Estate - Development · market cap $2.0b. 9% off the 52-week high of $76.00. Revenue -9% — in contraction; any catalyst that reverses this triggers re-rating.
Moat
Moat signals from the quantitative card are modest — profitability and capital efficiency are middle-of-pack. The thesis here depends on softer factors (switching costs, brand, distribution, regulatory protection) not captured by the quality-growth screen.
Risk
Revenue contracting -9% — the operational turn is not yet visible in the top line. Net margin 3.4% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first. ROE 5% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.