COMPARE · Reviewed July 29, 2026
CCK vs SON
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CCK scored 72.4, SON scored 70.7 — CCK leads.
Compare another set
CCK
Crown Holdings, Inc.
72.4
$119.76 · $13.0B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
1.7
CCK leads
SON
Sonoco Products Company
70.7
$58.98 · $5.8B
fundamentals as of
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
CCK
stronger →← stronger
SON
75
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
63
70
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
67
73
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
84
CCK is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CCK
SON
$995mC+
FCF
$217mC
+7.0%C+
Rev
+31.2%A
1.80C+
D/E
1.31C+
17.3xB+
P/E
9.1xA
0.64A-
PEG
0.21A
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
CCK
SON
46% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
60% above
~-8%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~18%/yr
+73%
1-yr DCF upside
-42%
+84%
5-yr DCF upside
-38%
+102%
10-yr DCF upside
-30%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
CCK
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
SON
No notable signals flagged.
The companies
CCKCrown Holdings, Inc.
Why now
Packaging & Containers · market cap $13.0b. Trading near 52-week high of $121.90 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. PEG 0.64 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 14 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $136.57 (implying +14% upside).
Moat
ROE 25% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 138% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trading within 2% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction.
SONSonoco Products Company
Why now
Packaging & Containers · market cap $5.8b. Trading near 52-week high of $60.67 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. Revenue growing +31% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.21 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 9 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $63.78 (implying +8% upside).
Moat
Net margin 14% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 28% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Trading within 3% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.