COMPARE · Reviewed July 29, 2026
CCK vs SLGN
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CCK scored 72.4, SLGN scored 59.8 — CCK leads.
Compare another set
CCK
Crown Holdings, Inc.
72.4
$118.37 · $12.9B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
12.6
CCK leads
SLGN
Silgan Holdings Inc.
59.8
$41.09 · $4.3B
fundamentals as of
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
CCK
stronger →← stronger
SLGN
75
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
54
70
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
74
73
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
54
CCK is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CCK
SLGN
$995mC+
FCF
$307mC
+7.0%C+
Rev
+9.6%B
1.80C+
D/E
2.01C
17.0xB+
P/E
15.4xA-
0.64A-
PEG
0.79A-
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
CCK
SLGN
46% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
36% below
~-9%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-5%/yr
+75%
1-yr DCF upside
+48%
+86%
5-yr DCF upside
+57%
+104%
10-yr DCF upside
+71%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
CCK
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
SLGN
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
The companies
CCKCrown Holdings, Inc.
Why now
Packaging & Containers · market cap $12.9b. Trading near 52-week high of $121.90 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. PEG 0.64 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 14 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $136.57 (implying +15% upside).
Moat
ROE 25% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 138% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trading within 3% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction.
SLGNSilgan Holdings Inc.
Why now
Packaging & Containers · market cap $4.3b. 17% off the 52-week high of $49.55. PEG 0.79 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 13 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $54.77 (implying +33% upside).
Moat
ROE 12% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 108% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
D/E 2.01 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Net margin 4.3% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.