COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
CCK vs ONON
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CCK scored 75.4, ONON scored 74.9 — CCK leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. CCK's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but ONON's are as of December 2025 — a 6-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
CCK
Crown Holdings, Inc.
75.4
$117.15 · $12.7B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
0.5
CCK leads
ONON
On Holding AG
74.9
$29.90 · $10.0B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestCCK16.9x
- Fastest growthONON+30.0%
- Strongest balance sheetONON0.29
- Highest qualityCCK77 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueCCK-57%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
CCK
stronger →← stronger
ONON
77
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
71
75
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
96
74
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
72
CCK is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CCK
ONON
$1.2bC+
FCF
$396mC
+10.3%B
Rev
+30.0%A
1.86C+
D/E
0.29A-
16.9xB+
P/E
20.5xB
0.64A-
PEG
0.59A-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
CCK
ONON
57% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
111% above
~-13%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~33%/yr
+117%
1-yr DCF upside
-61%
+130%
5-yr DCF upside
-53%
+153%
10-yr DCF upside
-39%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
CCK
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
ONON
Why this score
- Durable high returns
- Diluting shareholders
- Foreign reporter (CHF)
The companies
CCKCrown Holdings, Inc.
Why now
Packaging & Containers · market cap $12.7b. 5% off the 52-week high of $122.91. Revenue growing +10%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.64 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 14 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $136.57 (implying +17% upside).
Moat
ROE 27% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 153% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
ONONOn Holding AG
Why now
Footwear & Accessories · market cap $10.0b. Down 41% from 52-week high of $51.08 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +30% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.59 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 27 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $45.56 (implying +52% upside).
Moat
ROE 12% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Down 41% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Beta 2.12 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
CCK leads ONON by 0.5 points (75.4 to 74.9), its sharpest advantage coming in FCF (grade C+). A contrarian could still prefer ONON for its stronger D/E (grade A-). All screen as value-type names but sit in different sectors (Packaging & Containers versus Footwear & Accessories), so their grades are relative to different peer sets.
Our AI analyst is busy right now, so this verdict is drawn directly from the pillars, grades and DCF above.
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where CCK and ONON diverge
On the headline score the gap is 0.5 points in favor of CCK. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- GrowthCCK 75.4 · ONON 95.8ONON +20.4
- QualityCCK 77.0 · ONON 71.0CCK +6.0
- ValueCCK 73.9 · ONON 72.2level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.