COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
CCK vs KTB
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CCK scored 75.4, KTB scored 78.1 — KTB leads.
Compare another set
CCK
Crown Holdings, Inc.
75.4
$117.15 · $12.7B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
2.7
KTB leads
KTB
Kontoor Brands, Inc.
78.1
$78.99 · $4.3B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestKTB16.0x
- Fastest growthKTB+34.3%
- Strongest balance sheetCCK1.86
- Highest qualityKTB80 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueKTB-59%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
CCK
stronger →← stronger
KTB
77
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
80
75
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
89
74
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
67
KTB is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CCK
KTB
$1.2bC+
FCF
$422mC
+10.3%B
Rev
+34.3%A
1.86C+
D/E
2.06C
16.9xB+
P/E
16.0xB+
0.64A-
PEG
0.65A-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
CCK
KTB
57% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
59% below
~-13%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-7%/yr
+117%
1-yr DCF upside
+88%
+130%
5-yr DCF upside
+146%
+153%
10-yr DCF upside
+266%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
CCK
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
KTB
Why this score
- Durable high returns
The companies
CCKCrown Holdings, Inc.
Why now
Packaging & Containers · market cap $12.7b. 5% off the 52-week high of $122.91. Revenue growing +10%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.64 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 14 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $136.57 (implying +17% upside).
Moat
ROE 27% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 153% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
KTBKontoor Brands, Inc.
Why now
Apparel Manufacturing · market cap $4.3b. 11% off the 52-week high of $88.96. Revenue growing +34% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.65 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 10 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $97.70 (implying +24% upside).
Moat
ROE 43% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 158% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
D/E 2.06 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
The model favors KTB (76.5) over CCK (75.2), primarily due to KTB's superior Growth pillar score of 91, driven by its +31.0% revenue expansion. However, a contrarian might prefer CCK for its significantly lower implied growth of -13% per year, suggesting less market optimism is priced in. Investors should note the stocks operate in different sectors, Packaging & Containers versus Apparel Manufacturing.
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where CCK and KTB diverge
On the headline score the gap is 2.7 points in favor of KTB. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- GrowthCCK 75.4 · KTB 88.8KTB +13.4
- ValueCCK 73.9 · KTB 67.3CCK +6.6
- QualityCCK 77.0 · KTB 79.6level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.