COMPARE · Data as of August 14, 2026

CCK vs HRB

Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CCK scored 75.4, HRB scored 76.9 — HRB leads.
Compare another set
CCK
Crown Holdings, Inc.
Packaging & Containers · Quality-Growth
75.4
$119.02 · $12.9B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
1.5
HRB leads
HRB
H&R Block, Inc.
Personal Services · Quality-Growth
76.9
$53.92 · $6.8B
fundamentals as of
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD75.4/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY76.9GROWTH75.4VALUE73.8
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD76.9/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY95.5GROWTH66.2VALUE71.9
CCK
stronger →← stronger
HRB
77
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
95
75
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
66
74
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
72
CCK is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
CCK
HRB
$1.2bC+
FCF
$756mC+
+10.3%B
Rev
+4.9%C+
1.86C+
D/E
17.1xB+
P/E
9.5xA
0.64A-
PEG
0.73A-
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
CCK
HRB
56% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
50% below
~-13%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-9%/yr
+113%
1-yr DCF upside
+78%
+127%
5-yr DCF upside
+100%
+149%
10-yr DCF upside
+138%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
CCK
Why this score
  • Buying back stock
  • Raising its dividend
HRB
Why this score
  • Buying back stock
  • Raising its dividend
  • Durable high returns
CCKCrown Holdings, Inc.
Packaging & Containers · $119.02 · beta 0.58
Why now
Packaging & Containers · market cap $12.9b. 3% off the 52-week high of $122.91. Revenue growing +10%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.64 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 14 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $136.57 (implying +15% upside).
Moat
ROE 27% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 153% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
HRBH&R Block, Inc.
Personal Services · $53.92 · beta 0.35
Why now
Personal Services · market cap $6.8b. 8% off the 52-week high of $58.67. PEG 0.73 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 3 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $50.67 (implying -6% upside).
Moat
Net margin 19% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. FCF converts 103% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
HRB leads CCK by 1.5 points (76.9 to 75.4), its sharpest advantage coming in P/E (grade A). A contrarian could still prefer CCK, which trades about 56% below our DCF fair value — a margin of safety the score doesn't reward. All screen as value-type names but sit in different sectors (Packaging & Containers versus Personal Services), so their grades are relative to different peer sets.
Our AI analyst is busy right now, so this verdict is drawn directly from the pillars, grades and DCF above.
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.

Where CCK and HRB diverge

On the headline score the gap is 1.5 points in favor of HRB. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.

Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.