COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
CCK vs DECK
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CCK scored 75.4, DECK scored 79.7 — DECK leads.
Compare another set
CCK
Crown Holdings, Inc.
75.4
$117.15 · $12.7B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
4.3
DECK leads
DECK
Deckers Outdoor Corporation
79.7
$88.86 · $12.1B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestDECK12.6x
- Fastest growthCCK+10.3%
- Strongest balance sheetDECK0.21
- Highest qualityDECK96 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueCCK-57%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
CCK
stronger →← stronger
DECK
77
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
96
75
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
74
74
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
71
CCK is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CCK
DECK
$1.2bC+
FCF
$1.1bC+
+10.3%B
Rev
+7.9%B
1.86C+
D/E
0.21A-
16.9xB+
P/E
12.6xA-
0.64A-
PEG
1.12B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
CCK
DECK
57% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
30% below
~-13%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-2%/yr
+117%
1-yr DCF upside
+29%
+130%
5-yr DCF upside
+43%
+153%
10-yr DCF upside
+65%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
CCK
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
DECK
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Durable high returns
The companies
CCKCrown Holdings, Inc.
Why now
Packaging & Containers · market cap $12.7b. 5% off the 52-week high of $122.91. Revenue growing +10%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.64 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 14 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $136.57 (implying +17% upside).
Moat
ROE 27% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 153% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
DECKDeckers Outdoor Corporation
Why now
Footwear & Accessories · market cap $12.1b. Down 29% from 52-week high of $125.45 — deep drawdown territory. 21 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $122.81 (implying +38% upside).
Moat
Net margin 18% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 44% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 110% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
The model favors DECK (79.3) over CCK (75.4), primarily due to DECK's exceptional Quality pillar score of 95, significantly outpacing CCK's 77. However, a contrarian might prefer CCK for its substantial 55% discount to DCF fair value and a deeply pessimistic implied growth rate of -13% per year, signaling less optimism priced into its shares.
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where CCK and DECK diverge
On the headline score the gap is 4.3 points in favor of DECK. The widest single difference is Quality, where DECK leads by 18.7 points.
- QualityCCK 77.0 · DECK 95.7DECK +18.7
- ValueCCK 73.9 · DECK 71.3level
- GrowthCCK 75.4 · DECK 74.3level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.