COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
BALL vs CCK
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. BALL scored 60.3, CCK scored 75.4 — CCK leads.
Compare another set
BALL
Ball Corporation
60.3
$63.59 · $16.8B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
15.1
CCK leads
CCK
Crown Holdings, Inc.
75.4
$119.47 · $13.0B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestCCK17.2x
- Fastest growthBALL+15.6%
- Strongest balance sheetBALL1.31
- Highest qualityCCK77 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueCCK-56%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
BALL
stronger →← stronger
CCK
63
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
77
74
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
75
47
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
74
CCK is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
BALL
CCK
$827mC+
FCF
$1.2bC+
+15.6%B+
Rev
+10.3%B
1.31B
D/E
1.86C+
18.2xB
P/E
17.2xB+
1.21B
PEG
0.64A-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
BALL
CCK
9% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
56% below
~10%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-13%/yr
-18%
1-yr DCF upside
+112%
-8%
5-yr DCF upside
+126%
+10%
10-yr DCF upside
+148%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
BALL
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Durable high returns
CCK
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
The companies
BALLBall Corporation
Why now
Packaging & Containers · market cap $16.8b. 7% off the 52-week high of $68.29. Revenue growing +16%, comfortably above the S&P median. 14 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $72.57 (implying +14% upside).
Moat
ROE 17% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
CCKCrown Holdings, Inc.
Why now
Packaging & Containers · market cap $13.0b. Trading near 52-week high of $122.91 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. Revenue growing +10%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.64 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 14 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $136.57 (implying +14% upside).
Moat
ROE 27% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 153% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trading within 3% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where BALL and CCK diverge
On the headline score the gap is 15.1 points in favor of CCK. The widest single difference is Value, where CCK leads by 26.9 points.
- ValueBALL 47.0 · CCK 73.9CCK +26.9
- QualityBALL 62.7 · CCK 77.0CCK +14.3
- GrowthBALL 74.4 · CCK 75.4level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.