COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
AVY vs CCK
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. AVY scored 62.8, CCK scored 75.4 — CCK leads.
Compare another set
AVY
Avery Dennison Corporation
62.8
$183.71 · $13.9B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
12.6
CCK leads
CCK
Crown Holdings, Inc.
75.4
$119.47 · $13.0B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestCCK17.2x
- Fastest growthCCK+10.3%
- Strongest balance sheetAVY1.59
- Highest qualityCCK77 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueCCK-56%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
AVY
stronger →← stronger
CCK
74
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
77
67
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
75
50
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
74
CCK is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
AVY
CCK
$1.1bC+
FCF
$1.2bC+
+5.8%C+
Rev
+10.3%B
1.59C+
D/E
1.86C+
20.1xB
P/E
17.2xB+
1.92C+
PEG
0.64A-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
AVY
CCK
35% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
56% below
~-3%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-13%/yr
+41%
1-yr DCF upside
+112%
+54%
5-yr DCF upside
+126%
+76%
10-yr DCF upside
+148%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
AVY
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
CCK
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
The companies
AVYAvery Dennison Corporation
Why now
Packaging & Containers · market cap $13.9b. 8% off the 52-week high of $199.54. 10 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $201.80 (implying +10% upside).
Moat
ROE 30% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 151% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
CCKCrown Holdings, Inc.
Why now
Packaging & Containers · market cap $13.0b. Trading near 52-week high of $122.91 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. Revenue growing +10%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.64 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 14 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $136.57 (implying +14% upside).
Moat
ROE 27% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 153% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trading within 3% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
CCK leads AVY by 11.7 points (75.3 to 63.6), its sharpest advantage coming in PEG (grade A-). A contrarian could still prefer AVY, which trades about 36% below our DCF fair value — a margin of safety the score doesn't reward. Note they play different roles — AVY screens as growth, CCK screens as value — so the model rewards different traits for each.
Our AI analyst is busy right now, so this verdict is drawn directly from the pillars, grades and DCF above.
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where AVY and CCK diverge
On the headline score the gap is 12.6 points in favor of CCK. The widest single difference is Value, where CCK leads by 24.0 points.
- ValueAVY 49.9 · CCK 73.9CCK +24.0
- GrowthAVY 67.2 · CCK 75.4CCK +8.2
- QualityAVY 73.7 · CCK 77.0CCK +3.3
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.