COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
AMCR vs CCK
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. AMCR scored 67.9, CCK scored 75.4 — CCK leads.
Compare another set
AMCR
Amcor plc
67.9
$48.59 · $22.5B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
7.5
CCK leads
CCK
Crown Holdings, Inc.
75.4
$119.47 · $13.0B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestCCK17.2x
- Fastest growthAMCR+56.6%
- Strongest balance sheetAMCR1.28
- Highest qualityCCK77 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueCCK-56%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
AMCR
stronger →← stronger
CCK
54
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
77
89
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
75
64
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
74
CCK is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
AMCR
CCK
$1.2bC+
FCF
$1.2bC+
+56.6%A
Rev
+10.3%B
1.28B
D/E
1.86C+
20.4xB
P/E
17.2xB+
1.07B+
PEG
0.64A-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
AMCR
CCK
23% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
56% below
~-1%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-13%/yr
+23%
1-yr DCF upside
+112%
+30%
5-yr DCF upside
+126%
+40%
10-yr DCF upside
+148%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
AMCR
No notable signals flagged.
CCK
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
The companies
AMCRAmcor plc
Why now
Packaging & Containers · market cap $22.5b. 5% off the 52-week high of $50.94. Revenue growing +57% — in hypergrowth territory. 13 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $49.93 (implying +3% upside).
Moat
FCF converts 111% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Dividend payout 109% of earnings on a 5.5% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut. Net margin 4.7% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
CCKCrown Holdings, Inc.
Why now
Packaging & Containers · market cap $13.0b. Trading near 52-week high of $122.91 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. Revenue growing +10%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.64 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 14 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $136.57 (implying +14% upside).
Moat
ROE 27% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 153% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trading within 3% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
CCK leads AMCR by 7.7 points (75.4 to 67.7), its sharpest advantage coming in P/E (grade B+). A contrarian could still prefer AMCR, which trades about 23% below our DCF fair value — a margin of safety the score doesn't reward. Note they play different roles — AMCR screens as growth, CCK screens as value — so the model rewards different traits for each.
Our AI analyst is busy right now, so this verdict is drawn directly from the pillars, grades and DCF above.
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where AMCR and CCK diverge
On the headline score the gap is 7.5 points in favor of CCK. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- QualityAMCR 54.4 · CCK 77.0CCK +22.6
- GrowthAMCR 89.4 · CCK 75.4AMCR +14.0
- ValueAMCR 64.4 · CCK 73.9CCK +9.5
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.